On 3/28/23 17:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's?
At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the
end of the NAT rule...
That is for _changing_ rtable; if the interfaces inv
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> Anyway, what I am trying to figure out is how to NAT the rdomain's?
>
>
> At the moment from what I understand one has to put "rtable (n)" at the
> end of the NAT rule...
That is for _changing_ rtable; if the interfaces involved (the $vpn_net1
interface and $
Thanks Stuart!
On 3/28/23 16:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
On my WAN vlan for what I am going to call ISP-B, as ISP-A is existing
for a long time. What I'm trying to do right now is set this as a
default gateway for a particular subnet.
There's no such thing as
On 2023-03-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On my WAN vlan for what I am going to call ISP-B, as ISP-A is existing
> for a long time. What I'm trying to do right now is set this as a
> default gateway for a particular subnet.
There's no such thing as "default gateway for a subnet".
One way to do what y
> On 21 Mar 2023, at 05:05, Valdrin MUJA wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I have successfully configured the VPLS by following the instruction on
> https://pawa.lt/posts/2018/01/vpls-with-openbsd/.
> Everything worked like a charm.
>
> But when I tried to use veb(4) instead of bridge(4) , I got
Hi again,
so my shiny new fiber has been installed yesterday and currently I can
ping the gateway IP address but not much more.
It was interesting as they gave me this whole subnet and told me I get a
gateway address. What they should have said to eliminate my confusion
was that there is a
6 matches
Mail list logo
