On 8/6/23 06:32, Sean Kamath wrote:
On Jun 7, 2023, at 01:28, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Recorded at https://nxdomain.no/~peter/chatgpt_writes_pf.conf.html for those
who would be interested.
So in the thread that made you try it
(https://bsd.network/@dch/110501874752402311) they said:
"@pi
> On Jun 7, 2023, at 01:28, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
> Recorded at https://nxdomain.no/~peter/chatgpt_writes_pf.conf.html for those
> who would be interested.
So in the thread that made you try it
(https://bsd.network/@dch/110501874752402311) they said:
"@pitrh I’m still waiting for it to
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:38 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2023-06-07, Nick Bouliane wrote:
> > I have a bridge veb0 to which is connected tap1, the interface of a
> virtual
> > machine.
> > On the bridge I have a rule for tap1:
> > pass in on tap1 src 11:22:33:44:55:66 tag VM1
> >
> > In the
On 2023-06-07, Nick Bouliane wrote:
> I have a bridge veb0 to which is connected tap1, the interface of a virtual
> machine.
> On the bridge I have a rule for tap1:
> pass in on tap1 src 11:22:33:44:55:66 tag VM1
>
> In the bridge I also have an interface vport0 with the IP address
> 1921.168.0.
Prompted by a followup on Mastodon, I was enticed to see what feeding a prose
spec
for a pf.conf to ChatGPT would produce.
TL;DR: it failed miserably, but in a way that would have lead the gullible to
try it out raw, leading them down a route that would lead to loads of misery
and frustration.
5 matches
Mail list logo
