Captain Warez, Sir,
This list has already its share of spam and i think it doesn't need
yours. Some of us are reading messages from web list archivers like
marc.info. I don't need your offtopic messages there and neither your
answers to your own messages. Find another list for this purpose.
Thank
You can probably steal the code from slaacd(8).
On 23 February 2024 20:58:59 CET, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:25:18PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to add IPv6 support for pppd(8) (IPv6CP) and I encounter a
>> blocker
>> when adding a default IPv6
Le Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:58:59PM +0100, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> >
> > Should I also send the IFP, IFA and BRD sockaddrs from pppd(8) ?
>
> Don't think so.
>
> > How comes message sent from route(8) have more attributes when received by
> > monitor ?
>
> The kernel fills those in.
>
> Make
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:25:18PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to add IPv6 support for pppd(8) (IPv6CP) and I encounter a blocker
> when adding a default IPv6 route to PPP peer.
>
> Feb 23 17:26:45 rt-01 pppd[64071]: Couldn't add IPv6 default route: Network
> is unreacha
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:49:05 -0700
Ian Timothy wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 2024, at 10:33, Tom wrote:
> >
> > command `ssh user@fe80::262:bff::@em0` works just fine.
> >
> > `ssh -J user9001@jumpserver user@fe80::262:bff::%em0`
>
> Don’t know if this is the problem, but I notice
Hi all,
did anyone installed and boot successfully OpenBSD on Dell BOSS-S1
adapter or HBA330 non-raid controller ?
I've got Dell R740xd in lab and of course for storage controllers there
are BOSS-S1 and HBA330. :)
OpenBSD can be installed on these controllers but unfortunately it panic
at boot.
I
a good weekend indeed..
Feb 23, 2024 19:04:44 Nowarez Market :
>
> If you need to gamify an ipotetical homescreen of Xfce in OpenBSD
> how it could appear and what could be the possible price for a feedback to
> bugs@ ?
>
> Indeed I just gamified 5 Mode website: https://5mode.com
>
>
>> N0
Le Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:33:42PM -0500, Tom a écrit :
> Hi list!
>
> Could you please guide me how to use link-local addresses with jumphost?
>
> I have a server 'X' with a link local IPv6 address of
> fe80::262:bff::
> that IP is reachable from the server 'jumpserver' via interface em
> On Feb 23, 2024, at 10:33, Tom wrote:
>
> command `ssh user@fe80::262:bff::@em0` works just fine.
>
> `ssh -J user9001@jumpserver user@fe80::262:bff::%em0`
Don’t know if this is the problem, but I notice your two addresses are
different. Notice @em0 vs %em0.
One more information, ENETUNREACH is issued on line 521 of net/route.c.
Could this be some kind of race condition ?
>From route monitor, I get this after my RTM_ADD :
```
RTM_CHGADDRATTR: address attributes being changed: len 224, if# 7, name ppp0,
metric 0, flags:
sockaddrs:
:::fff
Hi list!
Could you please guide me how to use link-local addresses with jumphost?
I have a server 'X' with a link local IPv6 address of
fe80::262:bff::
that IP is reachable from the server 'jumpserver' via interface em0,
command `ssh user@fe80::262:bff::@em0` works just fine.
Ho
Hello,
I am trying to add IPv6 support for pppd(8) (IPv6CP) and I encounter a blocker
when adding a default IPv6 route to PPP peer.
Feb 23 17:26:45 rt-01 pppd[64071]: Couldn't add IPv6 default route: Network is
unreachable
Adding the default route from route(8) works when the connection is esta
Not 100% sure but there's a chance that this will work how you expect in
-current.
https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/029c661593e4bba8652393dbb912eaf3b5031eec
On 2024-02-23, Marko Cupać wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my OpenBSD firewall has static default route to the Internet over
> external interface,
Hi,
my OpenBSD firewall has static default route to the Internet over
external interface, and gets routes to internal subnets by means of
OSPF with Juniper switch over internal interface.
Host on one of internal subnets queries snmpd listening on internal
interface of OpenBSD firewall. When OSPF
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:58:51AM +0100, Marco van Hulten wrote:
> Today, after installing the latest snapshot, I do not get this error
> anymore. Does it contain the patch?
Yes, it should.
The latest snap's build date is newer than my commit from last night.
> Wi-Fi to normal access points is
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:17:45 +0100 Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 03:28:42PM +0100, Marco van Hulten wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:29:27 +0100 Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > Can you reproduce this on non-WPA-Enterprise networks,
> > > i.e. without eduraom / wpaakms 802.1x?
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
