Issue bridging vport and tap interfaces with veb

2024-06-03 Thread jrmu
Greetings, I am having a hard time figuring out how to bridge vport(4) and tap(4) interfaces. Previously, I had set up vmm with bridge(4) and vether(4), and all was working well. However, I recently heard that veb(4) has better performance, so I tried to replace my bridge0 and vether0 with veb0

Re: IPv6 routing problems with vether and vmm

2024-06-03 Thread jrmu
> When you manage a hypervisor, using only 1x/64 is less than ideal. It's just > not enough because you can have more than 1 'type of usage'. I always > request at least 1x/56. Thanks. I spoke with the ISP and he gave me a larger subnet, 2602:fccf:4::/48, I've been experimenting it by manually

Re: Debian 12 Under VMM

2024-06-03 Thread 04-psyche . totter
Hi all, I am trying to run Debian 12 under VMM. I can see on the email from 2024-04-02 that Bruce managed to make it work, but I don't know how. The crux of the issue is that the Debian ISO installer does not seem to work under serial console. Here's what I did: /etc/vm.conf vm "vm1" {

Re: amd64 bsd.rd for 7.0, 7.1, 7.2equentially. However it looks like

2024-06-03 Thread John McCue
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Quentin Carbonneaux wrote: Hi, I want to upgrade an amd64 system running 6.9. I do not know your setup, but upgrading from 6.9 to 7.5 may be an issue. Somewhere along the line I believe the default partition sizes changed. That means one of the

PCI ID missing

2024-06-03 Thread Dariusz K. Sendkowski
Hi, I've bought a new NVMe drive (Goodram PX700) and its both vendor and product IDs are missing in pcidevs. nvme0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 unknown vendor 0x1e4b product 0x1602 rev 0x01: msix, NVMe 2.0 nvme0: SSDPR-PX700-02T-80, firmware SN15299, serial G3F013435 The missing IDs (0x1e4b and

Re: Using nopass on a single user machine

2024-06-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024-06-03, 04-psyche.tot...@icloud.com <04-psyche.tot...@icloud.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any downside is using the nopass option of doas, for a single user > machine? > > It's a machine that I access to only via ssh, with an identity file. > > In what way would it increase the

Using nopass on a single user machine

2024-06-03 Thread 04-psyche . totter
Hi all, Is there any downside is using the nopass option of doas, for a single user machine? It's a machine that I access to only via ssh, with an identity file. In what way would it increase the attack surface to do so? Thanks, Jake