On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Ryan Freeman wrote:
> You might be interested in the ImageMagick (or GraphicsMagick) packages.
> The latter is a fork of the former, but they both supply the same
> commands. display, convert, mogrify are some of the commands available,
> and can be useful to do t
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Артур Истомин
wrote:
> When I search tabs in stock vi with '/\t'. It finds all words 'tried'. In
> vim it finds tabs. Why?
Because \t is a literal t in a standard regular expression. vim uses a
different regular expression library that interprets it as a tab. If
y
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Nils R wrote:
>The original st.info contains entries for {r,s}mkx, but when i query the
>system terminfo database
>with 'infocmp -1 st', no entries for {r,s}mkx are found:
>
> % egrep '[rs]mkx' st.info
> rmkx=\E[?1l\E>,
> smkx=\E[?1h\E=,
> % info
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> So $riva is a member of $lokisafe, right?
Bingo! I knew it would be something trivial that I'd overlooked. All
working now.
Thanks,
Tet
--
"Java is a DSL for taking large XML files and converting them to stack
traces" -- Bulat Shakirzyanov
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>> block in log
>> block out log on $ext
>
> How could anyone help you knowing just these two lines?
> Show your pf.conf
I was trying to show that I only had two block lines and that they
both should log when blocking packets. My rules are actual
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Aaron wrote:
> Did you enable forwarding?
>
> net.inet.ip.forwarding
Yes. Packets are being forwarded without problems, and it's working as
a firewall exactly as you'd expect for outbound traffic. I can browse
the web etc. But something strange is going on. Not o
My firewall died recently, so I replaced it with a new machine. Since
I needed to reinstall the OS, I naturally went for 5.4, rather than
whatever obsolete version I'd been using on the old machine. But now I
can't get incoming email. My setup is something like:
public mx ---> firewall ---
2010/11/2 Ari Constancio :
> Let me rephrase: I want to get man pages, and the link is
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi .
man(1) is your friend...
Tet
--
b It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be
wrong.b -- Chris Torek
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Brad Tilley wrote:
> I don't mean this as bashing Linux, just pointing out facts. I think
> history shows that OpenBSD has a better track record here (if that means
> anything to anyone).
Does it though? The only empirical evidence I've seen is with OpenBSD
runn
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Matthias Kilian
wrote:
> What detail in the original reply Theo sent to the OP (and quoted
> it later on this list) was rude?
The lack of an answer. He could have said "Yes. Check your nearest
search engine for details". Which would have conveyed more information
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
>> Sounds like building from source is necessary to me.
>
> boo hoo. run one machine somewhere and make release. done.
And that attitude is why OpenBSD will never be more than a hobby OS. Sigh.
Tet
--
b It seems intuitively obvious to me,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
>> Building from source is light years more difficult than
>> 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade, or 'yum upgrade' or
>> the like.
>
> so don't fucking do it, use releases and packages.
So how does one remedy CVE-2009-0696 like that? From th
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
> I'll believe there is something to release when something gets
> released or the OpenSSH devs say "oh, wait, there's a problem..."
>
> Until then I'm treating anything from that poster (anti-sec) as FUD and SPAM.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> because it is.
And therein lies some of the problem with the OpenBSD community. Don't
get me wrong, I like OpenBSD, I use it, and have donated to the
project. But here we have a user that has security concerns, and
rather than either admit
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Steve Laurie wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could tell me why there's a need to write
> a rule to block addresses that come under the private address space if
> these addresses aren't routable over the Internet?
An RFC that says they shouldn't be routeable o
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Stijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you post the output of "pfctl -s all".
I could do, but the problem was the lack of pf=YES in rc.conf
It all works fine now.
Tet
--
Perl is like vise grips. You can do anything with it but it is the
wrong tool for every jo
Hi...
The hard drive on my firewall machine died overnight, so I rebuilt
it with a new hard drive this morning. I grabbed the most recent
OpenBSD CD I had to hand (which was 3.8 -- yes, I know, and the
order for 4.4 followed as soon as I got to work and had net access
again).
The problem is that
17 matches
Mail list logo
