On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:21:10PM +0100, "Andr?? S." wrote:
> Am I missing something?
Is your user in the staff class? It has "ignorenologin" set by default. See
login.conf(5) and /etc/login.conf.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:42:04PM +1000, john slee wrote:
> VROOOM
cars, meh.
> For starters, there is 100% consensus among developers that we'll never
> use newfangled overengineered stuff like System V init.
>
You mean Upstart!
or wait
You mean systemd!
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:26:50AM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Better tha
> iptables?
> http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
> -Linux-Security.htm
> maybe...
Imagine the dynamic firewall technology in the cloud!
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:44:24AM +0200, David Steiner wrote:
> thoughts?
Some people don't like it when you make IRC logs publicly available.
> Your right that there are other ways to still login.
I meant "you're".
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:54:13PM -0400, swilly wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:22, Alexander Schrijver
> wrote:
> > It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
>
> Huh? Wouldn't securely backing up the RSA keys prevent this? If you
> are mi
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:00:18PM +0700, Edho P Arief wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Schrijver
> wrote:
> > It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
> >
>
> Unless you enable root login...
How does that help?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
> 1. You can limit connections using firewall.
> 2. You already have the feature by name "limiting the number of
> retries"
> 3. If you really want PROTECTION - you should turn off pa
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 06:05:49AM -0700, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
> Does somebody has an idea, that what kind of iptables/pf rule must i use to
> achieve this?:
>
> i only want to allow these connections [on the output chain]:
>
> on port 53 output only allow udp - dns
> on port 80 output only
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:07:48PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> When we build a project using ./configure && make && make install,
> inevitably there are invocations of all sorts of things. Is there a
> utility which can log which process was created, its invocation
> command, and then record it i
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:32:21PM -0800, Scott Stanley wrote:
> b. have been on this list for a while and totally disregarded the
> culture you were within.
grepping my mailbox it looks this is the case. Although he might be just a
troll.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:50:09PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> nope. I regularly see hardware which is supposed to be good, and which
> gives no problems under Linux, which causes a lot of problems under
> OpenBSD. I'm just about to throw away a bunch of recent machines that
> worked fine with old
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:18:08AM -0400, bsdmas...@hushmail.com wrote:
> FTP server down, amd64 snapshot packages way out of sync with
> latest libc bump... What the hell!
>
> If you guys don't get your sh*t together, I'm done.
>
> Yeah, you read that right.
>
> If this whole situation is not
>Absolutely, the U.S. Navy will know precisely where you are if you use
>TOR, but no one else will.
>Sincerely,
>IR
I meant that your IP address isn't the only thing you should try to hide.
There are a lot of very noisy protocols which can give your location or
identity away.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:45:22PM +, Internet Retard wrote:
> Wow... just wow... that is slick and *so* simple! Just like OpenBSD.
>
> So you sent that tinyurl link to the email account created by the imaginary,
> anonymous, disgruntled OpenBSD developers and the person who created the
> acco
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:07:12AM +0200, Mateusz Gierblinski wrote:
> I'm just wondering. Where are you OpenBSD users from?
The Netherlands!
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:36:41AM -0400, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:10:56 am Alexander Schrijver wrote:
> > I use the Sender: header.
>
> How is it that you manage to filter on that in gmail? Because it's not
> documented anywhere that I
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:16:38AM -0400, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 June 2010 11:11:59 pm you wrote:
> > I use gmail and I filter on:
> >
> > Matches: to:(misc@openbsd.org)
>
> A mail that is sent to misc@openbsd.org, and CC to my personal address,
> should
> have the mailing
Real men use butterflies.
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 02:15:19PM -0400, bofh wrote:
> Real men use ed.
>
>
>
> On 5/3/08, Jordi Espasa Clofent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I know, it's completely a dumb question; but I'm curious about it.
> >
> > I'm just learning C applied in networking are
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:01PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
> 2008/4/30 macintoshzoom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ""
> > # block nmap OS detection scans somewhat (-O)
> > block in quick proto tcp flags FUP/WEUAPRSF
> > block in quick proto tcp flags WEUAPRSF/WEUAPRSF
> > block in quick proto tcp flags
Write your own TCP/IP stack. But please read all the other replies
before you do so.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM, macintoshzoom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seen some pf.conf settings against remote OS detection at
> http://nmap.org/misc/defeat-nmap-osdetect.html#OPENBSD:
>
> ""The OpenBSD p
IIRC privoxy does what you want.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:18 PM, macintoshzoom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to HIDE "OpenBSD" as user-agent?
>
> For security reasons it is sometimes interesting to hide GLOBALLLY th
> O.S. you are running on AGAINST GIVING ANY CLUE TO HACKERS ABOUT HOW TO
>
Who needs god? We have daemon(3).
>sed 's/$OLD/$NEW/' $file <-I know this will only
> search and replace but how do I do in in-place so that the file itself is
> modified.*
sed -a 's/old/new/wfilename' filename
It is explained in:
cd /usr/share/doc/usd/15.sed/; make paper.txt; less paper.txt
Why dont you
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Comhte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks but that doesn't help me, could you explain please ?
>
> Alexander Schrijver a icrit :
>
>
> > openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
> > in /usr/local/
openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
in /usr/local/lib/.
On Jan 14, 2008 2:34 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PRO
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a w
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
> process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
> qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the available CPU, leaving the CPU
> 75% idle
On Nov 22, 2007 2:10 PM, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 05:35:00PM +0100, Alexander Schrijver wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I am trying to configure a virtual hosting system on OpenBSD, and I am
> > currently looking a
format as master.passwd.
Are there any other methods for doing this, or are there things I am
overlooking with this configuration?
Thanks,
Alexander Schrijver
On 9/16/05, BadMagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not
> what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris on there (using CDE) and it ran
> quite quickly but with OpenBSD, when I do an 'ls -la', it takes forever for
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
