On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Guido Tschakert <
guido.tschak...@src-gmbh.de> wrote:
> Am 13.08.2012 09:42, schrieb C. L. Martinez:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to do some tests with OpenBSD 5.1 and FreeBSD 9.1 beta in
> > my laptop virtual lab based on vmware workstation 8. But I have found
Hello all,
I went and bought a netgear WG311 PCI 54g (Wg311GE) card the other day
to put in my firewall. I intended to use this is as an access point for
a WLAN. This card is listed in the support hardware section on the
openbsd website under i386 but not amd64.
Anyways, I grabbed the lates
Hello all,
can anyone tell me if running 'ath' based cards in hostap mode is
reliable and stable ? I'm deciding whether to get a linksys wrt54g or to
throw an ath based card in my firewall and run it as the AP.
Also, does anyone know if I can run carp on wireless cards ?
Specifically, I curr
stan wrote:
Is there a way to do soemthing like "ntpq -p" with OpenBSD's OpenNTPD? I
really just want a quick way to assure myself that a given machine is "in
synch".
No, but you can send us some code
Only joking ;-)
I'd like that option also.
Steve Tornio wrote:
Because those addresses are in the XBL, not the SBL. The XBL is
populated by entries from the CBL, which are added when virus-like or
worm-like behavior is detected, and entries are removed at the first
request. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to try to create a
st
Steve Tornio wrote:
>>
>> FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see http://ordb.org/')dnl
>> FEATURE(`dnsbl',`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org',`Rejected - see
>> http://spamhaus.org/')dnl
>>
>> Jun 17 19:49:29 inetmail sendmail[13126]: ruleset=check_relay,
>> arg1=[210.213.176.247], arg2=127.0.0.4,
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
>
>
>
>>You mean a basic SMTP pass in ?
>>
>>This has been allowing mail to the mailserver for years, its only this
>>week that I tried the Spamd thingo
>>
>>pfctl -sr | grep -i sm
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
>
>
>
>>I also have the relevant pf rule in place;
>>
>>[firewall]# pfctl -vsn
>>rdr inet proto tcp from to any port = smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8025
>> [ Evaluations: 104628Pa
Hello,
I've just purchased 2 shiny new firewall boxes that I plan to have
running with CARP. I've read the man pages and Ryan McBrides
documentation and it all seems fairly straightforward, the hard part for
me seems to be the physical network side of things. I've searched the
archives and
Hello all,
Not sure if I'm missing something here with spamd so I thought I'd ask
the experts. I have it setup with the default config file (snipped) ;
[fw1]# cat /etc/spamd.conf
all:\
:spamhaus:china:korea:
# Mirrored from http://spfilter.openrbl.org/data/sbl/SBL.cidr.bz2
spamhau
The man page says;
"If the pass modifier is given, packets matching the translation rule
are passed without inspecting the filter rules:"
I like this as it will reduce the size of my rules file, however, how
can I "rdr pass" and have it honour (for want of a better word) altq ?
Cheers,
B
I am thinking of getting one (or two) of these for my new firewall, just
curious if nayone has any opinions on its suitability in such a role.
Spec as follows;
64bit 360mhz CPU (IIi)
128mb RAM
1 x 18gb 10krpm
2 x integrated NIC
1x PCI (which I intend to put a dual port compaq/intel NIC in)
Bas
12 matches
Mail list logo
