It can't be used to attack you from the public Internet unless (a) you don't
have a firewall or (b) you have forwarded the IME port on your firewall to a
host on your LAN. You are, however, susceptible to other hosts on your LAN
guessing the IME password, so be sure to use a strong password.
a snapshot with a fixed pfctl binary?
Any problem with dropping the new pfctl
binary into my 6.1-stable (i386) system?
P.S. I'm new to OpenBSD.
--------
On Sat, 5/13/17, Carl Mascott <cmasc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Subject: Re: pf queue defin
I forgot to ask: How will I know when there's a snapshot with a fixed pfctl
binary?
Any problem with dropping the new pfctl binary into my 6.1-stable (i386) system?
P.S. I'm new to OpenBSD.
On Sat, 5/13/17, Carl Mascott <cmasc...@yahoo.com>
roblem
To: "Carl Mascott" <cmasc...@yahoo.com>
Cc: misc@openbsd.org, t...@openbsd.org
Date: Saturday, May 13, 2017, 3:23 PM
Ah, I see what you mean. Indeed, we have to
make sure the remainder
is 0 when we're
displaying the bandwidth. I think the diff below is
what we want.
On Sat, 5/13/17, Mike Belopuhov <m...@belopuhov.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: pf queue definition: bandwidth resolution problem
To: "Carl Mascott" <cmasc...@yahoo.com>
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Saturday, May 13, 2017, 12:02 PM
On
Intel Atom D2500 1.66GHz
OpenBSD i386 v6.1-stable
I can't get pf to give me the queue bandwidths that I specify in pf.conf.
pf.conf:
queue rootq on $ext_if bandwidth 9M max 9M qlimit 100
queue qdef parent rootq bandwidth 3650K default
queue qrtp parent rootq bandwidth 350K min
6 matches
Mail list logo
