Hi,
when I change my router-id within /etc/ospfd.conf, my OSPF neighbour
will not go past EXSTA, but Cisco IOS will see the router-id as a new
router and go all the way to FULL.
How can I clear the neighbour association? `ospfctl reload` does nothing. I
would prefer not to kill the process as it
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:16:57PM +0100, Simen Stavdal wrote:
Hello,
I've had a similar issue before, and cannot quite remember in detail, but it
was something like this ;
thanks Simon for that - it's similar but not the same issue. uux
[hmnbx4r...@gatekeeper.wzrd.com] on #openbsd sorted me
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:56:04PM -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
It was not stated, but I've setup firewalls in the past, I presume you
have a firewall that is doing 'block in' as a catchall (which catches
the fragments) ..
Set your return policy on that rule if you wish it to return.
ok but
After wondering why my email was seeing MTU-like issues once I enabled
an record, I see that pf is dropping IPv6 packets that are
fragmented.
pf.conf(5):
1546: Currently, only IPv4 fragments are supported and IPv6 fragments are
blocked unconditionally.
in pf.c, under #ifdef INET6:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:43:33PM -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Theory suggests that PMTUD should handle things such that fragments do not
appear, but encapsulation and tunneling via IPSec tend to generate them
anyway..
Are we not breaking PMUTD by silently dropping these? Shouldn't there
be
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:50:00AM +, td wrote:
Charlie Allom wrote:
Hi,
scrub in log... passes pfctl -nf but doesn't report anything.
I know for a fact that it is doing *something* - does anyone know if
it's possible to see a real time activity of 'scrub' from pflog0
Hi,
scrub in log... passes pfctl -nf but doesn't report anything.
I know for a fact that it is doing *something* - does anyone know if
it's possible to see a real time activity of 'scrub' from pflog0 ?
Regards,
C.
--
020 7729 4797
http://blog.playlouder.com/
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:59:47PM -0700, andrew fresh wrote:
The problem I am seeing is that if I don't specify a router-id in
ospfd.conf, then if the highest IP on a peer router changes the automatic
Router ID, the session fails to start with a failed to form adjacency with
old ID error.
I
Hi,
I am trying to setup an active/active routing firewall setup with OSPF
so it load shares the traffic equally.
I am have created a test lab with IOS ASBR's that have
`default-information originate always` so I then can see 2 routes to
0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 via 2 routes.
It seems there is a
9 matches
Mail list logo
