Hi,
I have a non-urgent problem with OpenBPGD and would like to know
if anybody has a suggestion on what went wrong/I did wrong.
Situation: I replaced an openbgpd based router (R1) with new hardware.
Of course, the mac addresses of the interfaces changed. After
the swap the BGP session with anot
Sometimes it is very annoying that your settings in the .vmx won't be
respected / changed back by the VI client.
A very slow, but bullet-proof method is the following:
1.) Connect directly with the VI client to the ESX
(I do not have virtual center)
2.) Stop the VM and remove it from the inven
Just for the record:
I upgraded to ESX 3.0.2 and...
1.) So far, I did not observe any stalls on the emulated e1000 (em)
interfaces. Currently I am playing with the vmxnet driver as well.
2.) VGT mode seems to work correct, very short ethernet frames (i.e.,
ICMP ping packets produced by windows
>For what it's worth, I experienced the same problem caused by
>attaching and detaching a (short) crossover cable multiple times
>on a vr interface in
The cable used in the situation when things went wrong
was also short, < 1m.
>soekris net5501 running 4.1-stable. As it was on a production
>fire
Are these interfaces configured in "autoselect" mode? What happens when
you configure them in fixed mode, e.g. 100Mb/full duplex?
Sounds like a good idea. In the future, I will configure them in fixed
mode, it won't hurt.
Even though it may have something to do with the autoselect mode,
the who
Not sure if related, but something similar has been fixed in
4.2-current already.
This was also the first thing that came into my mind, however, I don't
think it is related. VR_STICKHW is only written erroneously during
attach, and since my machine runs now for several weeks without any
problem,
> I've personally not had any issues with the vlance driver. Have two
> 4.1 guests on ESX3.0.1, been running since around July without issues
> well,
...
> considering I haven't had any issues to date. I will admit they don't
> get a lot of heavy use.
In my case the pattern produced by executin
Dear all,
I am seeking for people that run OpenBSD 4.1 on ESX servers and want to
share their experiences =)
To make sure that I won't provoke replies like 'idiot, virtualization
subverts the safety of OpenBSD' I hereby declare that I do not want to
use this for productive systems (...not).
I applied the diff manually to -stable (watch out for
path_updateall/prefix_updateall), and now it works perfectly.
Thanks, Claudio!
And here is a preliminary diff for all the curious ones. bgpd needs to
track changes of routes with F_NEXTHOP checked and report them to the RDE.
The RDE will the
Hi,
I am testing OpenBGPD and OpenOSPFD on a couple of Soekris boxes.
Even though I am using the latest code (-stable with ospfd kroute.c
revision 1.48), I am having problems with the kernel routing table
when OSPFD has to react to changes in the topology. I verified the
problem on a virtual setu
10 matches
Mail list logo
