On 08/04/2018 23:16, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> 963Mbps
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 18:02, Michael Price wrote:
>
>> Was it an apu2c4 by any chance? I was thinking about picking one of those up
>> and was curious as to what kind of packet rates people were seeing with them.
Obtaining a gig isn't
On 05/10/2017 22:39, Eric Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Mihai Popescu wrote:
I'm at a small Wireless ISP in a small town and have only a Class C block
of addresses.
[...]
[...]
Very romantic, indeed, but it has nothing to do with OpenBSD.
Are you serious?
Since the primary fi
On 26/07/2017 00:56, jungle Boogie wrote:
> On 25 July 2017 at 15:20, Doggie wrote:
>> W dniu 2017-07-25 o 19:39, Peter J. Philipp pisze:
>>>
>>> Actually I bought the silent fans. So I don't have to write any code,
>>> too bad the foxconn fans are a misdesign. I'll maintenance this router
>>> n
On 29/06/2017 12:06, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Joe Holden wrote:
>> It looks like setting the mtu on cnmac interfaces doesn't quite work as
>> expected, whatever the mtu is set to the upper limit appears to be 1510
>> as although it w
On 27/06/2017 19:57, Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> It looks like setting the mtu on cnmac interfaces doesn't quite work as
> expected, whatever the mtu is set to the upper limit appears to be 1510
> as although it will transmit frames of any arbitary size (e.g 2000
>
Hi guys,
It looks like setting the mtu on cnmac interfaces doesn't quite work as
expected, whatever the mtu is set to the upper limit appears to be 1510
as although it will transmit frames of any arbitary size (e.g 2000
bytes), the reply never makes it back (confirmed from an attached box)
unless
On 18/06/2017 10:59, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-06-17, Paul Suh wrote:
>> Folks,=20
>>
>> My understanding of the way that this is done is by returning a CNAME =
>> when the ISP's DNS recursive DNS server would otherwise return a =
>> NXDOMAIN result, followed by a HTTP 302 when the browse
went like this
>
> 80.2.249.209 cpc77525-cwma10-2-0-cust208.7-3.cable.virginm.net
>
> I run most traffic through a vpn but my router is a Virgin SuperHub2, as
> they call it.
>
>
> To Dot Yet,
>
> I've through system logs etc and nothing seems to look suspicious. C
On 15/06/2017 16:47, Dot Yet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:12 AM Maurice McCarthy
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> $ xauth list
>> ...
>> advancedsearch.virginmedia.com:0 MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1
>> f3aa08ed0926482c51f5cb386e28a0ea
>>
>>
>> Virgin Media is my ISP. Is this an intrusion into my system pleas
Might be useful, particularly in scripting...
Behaves like losetup.
Index: sbin/mount_vnd/mount_vnd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/mount_vnd/mount_vnd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.20 mount_vnd.c
--- sbin/mount_vnd/moun
On 18/03/2017 08:21, Florian Obser wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:59:44PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
On 09/03/2017 23:35, Joe Holden wrote:
On 09/03/2017 23:02, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi,
So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using
level SOL_SOCKET and the current
On 09/03/2017 23:35, Joe Holden wrote:
On 09/03/2017 23:02, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi,
So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using
level SOL_SOCKET and the current rtable is >0, so eg if you're in table
1 and you do ping -V0 it will fail.
Can anyone shed any ligh
On 09/03/2017 23:02, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi,
So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using
level SOL_SOCKET and the current rtable is >0, so eg if you're in table
1 and you do ping -V0 it will fail.
Can anyone shed any light on why this is restricted? Especial
Hi,
So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using
level SOL_SOCKET and the current rtable is >0, so eg if you're in table
1 and you do ping -V0 it will fail.
Can anyone shed any light on why this is restricted? Especially since
the same can be achieved with route -T
On 09/03/2017 11:51, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 07/03/17(Tue) 19:38, Joe Holden wrote:
On 12/12/2016 16:55, Joe Holden wrote:
On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote:
On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one
On 12/12/2016 16:55, Joe Holden wrote:
On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote:
On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
Hello,
This looks like some stupid TV game, where
On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote:
On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
Hello,
This looks like some stupid TV game, where contesters are given some
clues from time to
On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
Hello,
This looks like some stupid TV game, where contesters are given some
clues from time to time and they have to guess what is the real shit.
Do post your FULL dmesg and configur
On 08/12/2016 14:35, Joe Holden wrote:
On 08/12/2016 13:56, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just updated a couple of boxes to the Dec 7th snapshot and I'm
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
The box in question is an OSPF and BGP speaker, and the
On 08/12/2016 13:56, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just updated a couple of boxes to the Dec 7th snapshot and I'm
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
The box in question is an OSPF and BGP speaker, and the following
happens when booted:
After OS
Hi guys,
I've just updated a couple of boxes to the Dec 7th snapshot and I'm
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
The box in question is an OSPF and BGP speaker, and the following
happens when booted:
After OSPF and BGP tables load, a couple of minutes later
On 02/12/2016 12:45, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:55:23AM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
Is anyone else seeing abnormally high load averages on recent snapshots?
Seeing load reported as ~1 on idle machines (both VM and physical, amd64 and
octeon):
9:48AM up 34 mins
Hi guys,
Is anyone else seeing abnormally high load averages on recent snapshots?
Seeing load reported as ~1 on idle machines (both VM and physical, amd64
and octeon):
9:48AM up 34 mins, 1 user, load averages: 1.21, 1.13, 1.01
(octeon snapshot as of 30th Nov)
Another example on KVM guest:
On 15/01/2014 12:58, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 15-01-2014 06:20, Martijn Rijkeboer escreveu:
Is it possible to create an IP unnumbered setup with PPPoE on OpenBSD?
And what the heck you mean by "unnumbered"? If it is wildcard address,
and by it, that the pppoe access concentrator provides t
That is the EJTAG port (debug.. single stepping the cpu etc) AFAIK (haven't
tested yet as I don't have the appropriate kit handy)
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
> Behalf Of Mihai Popescu
> Sent: 27 August 2013 18:12
> To: misc@openbsd
On 27/08/2013 14:08, Joe Holden wrote:
On 26/08/2013 18:34, Radio młodych bandytów wrote:
Hello,
I'm just reading through Octeon installation instructions:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/octeon/INSTALL.octeon
What caught my attention is a statement:
"There is no USB s
On 26/08/2013 18:34, Radio młodych bandytów wrote:
Hello,
I'm just reading through Octeon installation instructions:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/octeon/INSTALL.octeon
What caught my attention is a statement:
"There is no USB support yet, which means that
there is no st
carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote:
IA64 its the name of the arch for the processor created originali by AMD and
INTEL copied so support for AMD64 mean INTEL64 too! dont complain if u really
dont read all of the info (i understand now why my questions are not answered
LOL)
No. If you're going
Christopher J. Umina wrote:
Hello,
I'm hoping Claudio or someone can take a quick look at this:
I'm testing a simple hub/spoke VPN configuration using vtun (tun
interfaces) for 'last mile' between sites. Over the tunnels, I would
like to run EBGP sessions using OpenBGPd (on FreeBSD 9.1) on both
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:28:38 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:32:16 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
2013-05-07 22:29:03:INFO: ppp id=1 layer=chap proto
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:32:16 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
I'm testing out npppd as a termination device which is being fed from
existing LACs (in this particular setup, mpd on FreeBSD) - i
Hi,
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
I'm testing out npppd as a termination device which is being fed from
existing LACs (in this particular setup, mpd on FreeBSD) - if the LAC
begins LCP to challenge the client for it's username i
Hi all,
I'm testing out npppd as a termination device which is being fed from
existing LACs (in this particular setup, mpd on FreeBSD) - if the LAC
begins LCP to challenge the client for it's username in order to lookup
the destination LNS, npppd just repeats the following until it gives up:
33 matches
Mail list logo
