On 2/14/2020 11:21 AM, Fabio Martins wrote:
I am trying now only with the redirect to www.openbsd.org, if it works, I
am sure it can be adapted to my case.
Unfortunately still no success.
# pf.conf:
ext_if="xnf0"
match in log on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 8099 tag RDR \
On 2/14/2020 6:30 AM, Fabio Martins wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks. I applied both rules below, unfortunately I am still only hitting
rule number #1 (rdr-to). nat-to is never reached (added "log" on each to
test). I tried inverting the order, too, but no luck.
#1
match in on $ext_if proto tcp from
Hi Fabio,
I believe this will do what you want, seemed to work in quick testing
here, adjust to suit your environment.
match in on $ext_if proto tcp from to ($ext_if) port 25
rdr-to 200.200.200.200 port
match out on $ext_if proto tcp to 200.200.200.200 port received-on
$ext_if
Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm running two HPDL360 G5 servers with OpenBSD 4.6+carp+pf+pfsync as
an active/passive firewall pair.
Both are running: (full dmesg at bottom, along with edited pf.conf, in
case it's relevant)
j...@f2:/home/joe uname -a
OpenBSD f2 4.6 GENERIC.MP#81 amd64
Carl Horne wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but I run into another block. This time it's dhcpd that is having the
issue. I hope Stuart can find an answer as fast as he did last time. This is
the issue. If I have 20 or less interfaces configured then dhcpd starts up as
expected. Dhcpd listens to the carp
Sunnz wrote:
Ok I am totally lost... googling MaxCPEPerChild gives no result,
while MaxCPUPerChild gives lots of OpenBSD httpd.conf file with the
exact same conf I have,
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/6/16/2138454 where
MaxCPUPerChild 0...
You've had at least one bit
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
Any idea on how it might be possible to boot the system step by step
to get an idea of where this bug might be isolated?
I strip the boot process as much as possible and this is a very old
issue, but may be there is a way to find more in it. Looking at it
more, I
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Hi,
Vinicius Vianna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's possible using multipath, take a look at
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath please.
But I needed to use some pf route-to rules to re-route the packets
between the multiple gateways. It takes
Kasper Revsbech wrote:
I have attached to windows xp clients by crossed cable one to each if
(vr and vr2)
The fun begins here, when i turn on and off the windows machines a
couple of times one of the can't obtain a IP. It actually brings
down the whole interface. I can't attach another
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
So, back to the issue at hand. Anybody have fond memories of great 486
or Pentium-based servers (or other arch equivs)?
Doug.
Back in 1999, I picked up several used HP Vectra Pentium 100 desktops
for use as backup backup dial in administration machines at our
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
I suppose another option is to use pf to filter out all incoming traffic
to the servers originating from Windows computers maybe except to
relevant services like http port or https. If we could see a blanket
ban on connecting Windows machines to the net, things would
johan beisser wrote:
On Dec 24, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Lord Sporkton wrote:
i could be wrong but here is my 2 cents:
ive seen something like this related to upnp, i would venture to guess
your 2 friends have routers which support upnp and so far as i know
openbsd does not support upnp.
I would
12 matches
Mail list logo
