I've run both, and agree with this. The Soekris isn't built with very
good parts (== unstable over time), the Lanner box is a solid performer.
I'm going to try out the 7535 soon.
Pierre
On 12/4/2010 5:21 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2010/12/3:
Hello, I'm considering buying a Soekris net5501-70
It's really easy, you can send some of the 1's and 0s to peer 21, and
some 1's and 0's to peer2.
Assuming the halves are contiguous, you would probably announce 2x /21's.
You could also really try and be very specific and announce them as a
bunch of /32's, this would give you the granularity y
Without the "quick" keyword, pf evaluates all of your rules and if a
more-permissive rule exists to match the traffic flow, it is used. This
is different than some commercial firewalls such as Check Point which
stop when the traffic matches a rule, and the rules are processed in order.
It's co
Look at everything on interrupt queue 10.
pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt
bge1 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5721" rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1
(0x4101): irq 10, address 00:17:08:2c:2a:76
em2 at pci7 dev 6 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB)" rev 0x03:
irq 10,
address 00:13
page should say 'Display the UTC in GMT time'?
If I understand it correctly, UTC is the timezone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#UTC
/Markus
Pierre Lamy wrote:
GMT is the timezone, UTC is the time.
P
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Nick ! w
GMT is the timezone, UTC is the time.
P
jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
>
>> On 4/10/07, Markus Bergkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 'date -u' on a 4.0 -stable will give something like
>>> Tue Apr 10 22:03:24 GMT 2007
>
Though I should note that setting just max-mss 1440 did work.
Thanks guys!
Pierre
Pierre Lamy wrote:
Last night I wanted to try out the kernel pppoe rather than userland
pppoe, on 4.0 GENERIC/i386.
Took me a few minutes but I was able to setup a stable connection,
surf the net etc. Many thing
nal network
to 1492 to prevent any frags from being generated?
Cheers,
Pierre Lamy
-=-
My relevent pf entries
# macros
int_if = "fxp0"
#ext_if = "pppoe0"
ext_if = "tun0"
# options
set skip on lo
set block-policy return
set loginterface $ext_if
# scrub
scrub in
Hint: Try setting the LogLevel to "debug" to find out more.
James Turner wrote:
Well I fixed the permissions problem by chgrp /dev/ulpt0 to _cups.
However now when I try to print there are no errors and nothing is
sent to the printer. This might be my filters problem. I have a
MFC-210C and t
Send us a dmesg. How much memory does the box have?
If it will legitimately serve that much traffic, try lowering the Apache
timeouts to lower than the default (iirc 60 seconds?). Then match those
timeouts to pf.
Are you using source-hash in the config? That will create a state table
of alre
Your card is not supported in 4.0-release
bge0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5721" rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1
(0x4101): apic 4 int 16 (irq 12), address 00:30:48:88:6c:ac
From the bge man page...
The BCM5700, BCM5701, BCM5703 and BCM5704 are capable of supporting
Jumbo
frames, which
The problem is that a non-MTA is trying to write something to /var/mail,
which is bad.
The OpenBSD developers can't account for every third party's wierd way
of doing things; you did the right thing by mailing the developer, but
if they can't help you maybe you should switch to a different pop3
12 matches
Mail list logo
