Hi
Thank you very much for the heads-up! If it's a regular fault that can
be cleared over XSCF/ALOM it's not a problem for me to do myself, but I
might wait for further information either way.
Will contact kettenis@ to find out where things are at.
Thanks again..
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:38:26 -
be brief and Solaris will be getting loaded by
the time the late comers and the hungover turn up to the office. :-P
But I figured there may be some interest. Happy to give you what I can.
Cheers,
--
Scott Radvan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e to check your net.inet.tcp.recvspace and
net.inet.tcp.sendspace sysctl settings, as mentioned here in the FAQ,
Section 6.6.4.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Tuning
I saw a similar problem on my ADSL2+ line, until changing these
particular parameters. With any luck, it will allow you to make full
use of your connection speed and resolve the issues you are having.
--
Scott Radvan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
look at:
http://www.chillispot.org/
--
Scott Radvan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
quid .
>
>
> -sonjaya-
>
The following site will help, read it from beginning to end, you will
be much wiser:
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/proxy/
--
Scott Radvan
On 31 Aug 2006 07:52:28 +0200
Frangois Chambaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Radvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello misc,
> >
> >
> > I have been installing 4.0- beta snapshots via FTP on a few machines
> > (i386 and
shots?
>
> Besides that the install media are totally full?
Ok, hadn't considered that. I guess it may not make much sense to add
sysctl to just the snapshots, and not the release CDs.
Thanks for the quick reply, I appreciate it.
--
Scott Radvan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But, out of curiosity, is there a reasoning for not including the
sysctl binary on the install image, and hence not allowing sysctl
modifications during the installation of these snapshots? Or am I
missing something which could allow the install to use all available
bandwidth?
Cheers,
--
8 matches
Mail list logo