Re: Default route distribution by ospfd

On 08/14/2011 01:39 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: redistribute default requires a default route in the routing table on the router redistributing it. (ospfctl show da self) Additionally look if the route shows up in the rib. (ospfctl show rib) on the routers you expect them to appear. Also see if th

Re: Default route distribution by ospfd

On 08/14/2011 12:19 AM, Dag Richards wrote: Shot in the dark here new to OSPF myself Have you tried adding vlan208 interface on R1 to OSPF config on R1? R1 has no vlan208 interface configured. R1 uses trunk0 to connect to access mode switch ports in VLAN 208. R2 and R3 have vlan208 interfaces

Default route distribution by ospfd

Hi, I have the following set-up: |R2other routers | ISPR1 | |R3other routers There is a static default route on R1 pointing to ISP's gateway (192.168.60.253). R1, R2, R3 and other routers (except ISP's) are running ospfd in area 0.0.0.0. R

Re: can't get binat working

>> Do I need to set an alias IP (the mapped IP) for binat to work? >> >> > > Technically not, you just need 'some way' to get other hosts to send > you traffic for that address. Could be proxy arp, could be route table > entries (static or routing protocols), but in practice adding an > alias IP is

Re: can't get binat working

On 1/12/2010 9:03 PM, Jim Razmus wrote: * Shohrukh Shoyoqubov [100112 01:35]: Hello, I am new to pf and I am trying to do binat but it is not working for some reason. fxp1 is the interface on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 vr0 is the interface on subnet 192.168.2.0/24 Here is my pf.conf #left

Re: can't get binat working

On 1/12/2010 4:01 PM, Shohrukh Shoyoqubov wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Laurent CARON wrote: On 12/01/2010 07:19, Shohrukh Shoyoqubov wrote: I want all traffic to 192.168.0.253 to be forwarded to 192.168.2.2. I assume that should make 192.168.0.253 visible in 192.168.0.0

Re: can't get binat working

On 1/12/2010 7:02 PM, Wade, Daniel wrote: Do you have net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 set? Yes. The machine actually acts as a router for some other networks. It has more interfaces in fact. I just showed the ones involved in binat.

Re: can't get binat working

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Laurent CARON wrote: > On 12/01/2010 07:19, Shohrukh Shoyoqubov wrote: >> >> I want all traffic to 192.168.0.253 to be forwarded to 192.168.2.2. I >> assume that should make 192.168.0.253 visible in 192.168.0.0/24 >> subnet, but it is

can't get binat working

Hello, I am new to pf and I am trying to do binat but it is not working for some reason. fxp1 is the interface on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 vr0 is the interface on subnet 192.168.2.0/24 Here is my pf.conf #left from the original pf.conf set skip on lo pass# to establish keep-state block

Re: ServeRAID 5i problem with current snapshot

Hello, I am having absolutely the same problem with ServeRAID 5i on my x235. I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.6 release. It seems ips is included in the default RAMDISK_CD. Any ideas? Thank you, Shohrukh On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Otto Bretz wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to install a new

Re: OpenBSD and ISDN TA

There is a Sangoma card supported by OpenBSD, it is ISDN PRI (T1/E1) though, not BRI. I think it is A101, not sure about other models. 2008/1/9, SeDoFa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Simply question: does OpenBSD support ISDN? > > I have great interest to use OpenBSD as ISDN router with an external > IS

Re: Site-to-site IPSec VPN between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E

24775]: dropped message from I.J.K.L port 500 due to notification type INVALID_COOKIE Shohrukh Shohrukh Shoyoqubov wrote: # netstat -rn -f encap Routing tables Encap: Source PortDestinationPort Proto SA(Address/Proto/Type/Direction) E.F.G.H/32 0A.

Re: Site-to-site IPSec VPN between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E

/esp/require/out # Brian A. Seklecki wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Shohrukh Shoyoqubov wrote: Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:46:54 +0500 From: Shohrukh Shoyoqubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Site-to-site IPSec VPN between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E From which machine do

Re: Site-to-site IPSec VPN between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E

-lnevv -i pflog0 regards christoph -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Shohrukh Shoyoqubov Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. November 2007 18:08 An: misc@openbsd.org Betreff: Site-to-site IPSec VPN between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E Hello! I

Site-to-site IPSec VPN between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E

Hello! I am having troubles with setting up site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel between OpenBSD and Cisco PIX 515E. I have the following configuration [ A.B.C.B ] <-> [ OpenBSD 4.1 (M.N.O.P) ] <-- Internet --> [ (I.J.K.L) Cisco PIX 515E ] <-> [ E.F.G.H ] # cat /etc/ipsec.conf ike esp from A.B.C.D to E.