On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:04:01AM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
[stuff deleted for brevity]
I am in a similar situation (squid at home) and I simply have a
blacklist with lines like these:
doubleclick
facebook
scorecardresearch
Works like a charm for me, and no need to look up IP
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:27:38AM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
block facebook.com via hosts-file.
snip
My question is on the squid-server
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 05:42:04AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
Holy Jesus, nobody read this guys email.
He is not an administrator trying to block users
access to facebook, he just doesn't want facebook snooping
him when he visits other websites.
He has been given the right answer already.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 05:53:09PM +0300, What you get is Not what you see
wrote:
Hi
I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 on a machine and try to use NFS exports
on it. But the performance is very bad.
I have another machine with 4.1 on it whose NFS performance is
awesome. I did the same
Dear misc@,
Am I correct when I assume that timed, using the Berkeley Unix TSP
protocol, is not capable of dealing with subnets? It's a 25 year
old protocol so I have to fear the answer is yes.
The reason I ask is that I recently bought a (2nd hand) managed
switch and foolishly enough decided to
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:29:22AM +0930, David Walker wrote:
[citation needed]
http://bit.ly/3dMFBs
Best message on this thread in days.
Agreed.
Several gems in a row.
And probably the last one worth reading. Including this one. All are invited
to join me in a nice hot cup of STFU.
On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC
kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers setting to 128.
Config warned me that config: warning: maxusers (128) 100.
I grepped around in /usr/src/usr.sbin/config and found
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC
kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On one of my PCs I ran into the process
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
[mostly deleted for brevity]
You are confusing groups and login classes.
Foot in mouth time, putting in staff with vipw has magically lifted
the 100 process limit. Now back to a lower maxusers setting (below 100),
maybe something
10 matches
Mail list logo
