Well as far as I know, Apache 1.3 is an openBSD modified version and not the
1.3 apache releases but the licensing on apache 2.0 is the reason I see
OpenBSD not packaging it.
http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Also search back into the mailing list archives or the site for more
specific
On 2/7/06, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RedShift wrote:
Hi everyone
I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that
on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an
additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later,
httpd 1.3
Look up the man page on
pty(4)http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ptysektion=4it
will tell you how and what is needed to increase the number of pseudo
terminals on the system, specifically kern.tty.maxptys if you need more than
992 that it says is set.
On 1/5/06, Kim Onnel [EMAIL
I love this part
You know what I found? Right in the kernel, in the heart of the operating
system, I found a developer's comment that said, 'Does this belong here?'
Lok says. What kind of confidence does that inspire? Right then I knew it
was time to switch.
On 6/17/05, J. Lievisse Adriaanse
Just to guess.
In most of the article Linux was being criticized from a code standpoint,
both in the design and the system they use to develop.
On 6/17/05, Abraham Al-Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm actually curious as to the apparent change of stance between
interviews.
In the last two
i believe that the biggest bottleneck is the hard drive, I think there is a
2.5 5400rpm or 4200rpm drive in it. You can of course always pop it out but
most people using the mac mini probably aren't looking for a proformance
boost.
On 6/16/05, Bryan Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 16,
6 matches
Mail list logo
