Re: Kernel Panic with 3.9-current MP

Hello all, We also faced similar problem several times after upgrading to 3.9. What could be the problem? regards murthy Federico Giannici wrote: > It happened again: one of our servers with OpenBSD i386 3.9-current MP > of a couple days ago crashed with the following kernel error: >

Re: kernel settings for pf default block

3, 2006 at 05:30:21PM -0700, c.s.r.c.murthy wrote: > >>This seems to be widely discussed problem in openbsd pf. There is no >>kernel parameter that makes the pf to block all packets by default. > > > Is something wrong with just putting ``block all'' in p

Re: kernel settings for pf default block

05:30:44PM -0700, c.s.r.c.murthy wrote: > >>Hi, >>This seems to be widely discussed problem in openbsd pf. There is no >>kernel parameter that makes the pf to block all packets by default. I >>have searched on the internet and found some discussion taken place

kernel settings for pf default block

Hi, This seems to be widely discussed problem in openbsd pf. There is no kernel parameter that makes the pf to block all packets by default. I have searched on the internet and found some discussion taken place in 2005 regarding this. The discussion concludes no such parameter in kernel. Ar

ftp-proxy does not work in secure level 2

Hi, We have configured a firewall with pf on openbsd-3.9. It is found that ftp-proxy is unable to operate when system is put in secure level 2. This is due to the fact that ftp-proxy can't add/delete rules in pf in secure level 2. But for security reasons we would like to have the system runnin