Re: NAT64 troubleshooting

2013-12-12 Thread dikshie
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=138217915717512&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=138252644515796&w=2 thank you! -- -dikshie-

Re: ipv6 static routing

2013-12-12 Thread dikshie
in kvm speak) it works like a champ. > Perhaps you could try this change; I also would not be surprised if some > multicast > bits that recently changed got twiddled for vio(4) as well. Thank you for the information. I'll change from vio to e1000. -dikshie-

Re: NAT64 troubleshooting

2013-12-12 Thread dikshie
information. i searched cvs mailing list archive, looking at cvsweb/cvs log, and i still can't find information related to some fixes for af-to. -- -dikshie-

Re: NAT64 troubleshooting

2013-12-10 Thread dikshie
Power" rev 0x03: apic 1 int 9 iic0 at piixpm0 - > BTW you're probably better off using BIND 9 from ports which has > built-in DNS64 support, rather than totd. BIND config is something > like this (in the options section) :- > dns64 2xxx:xxx::6464::/96 { clients { any; }; }; i'll consider dns64 under bind in the future. -- -dikshie-

NAT64 troubleshooting

2013-12-09 Thread dikshie
hing here? where's should i do debugging? thanks! -- -dikshie-

Re: ipv6 static routing

2013-12-08 Thread dikshie
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > Check with tcpdump if the packets go out and to the right place. > Maybe try to figure out if they arrive at the destination to figure out > where they get lost. sure, i'll check with tcpdump after working/business hour. -dikshie-

Re: ipv6 static routing

2013-12-08 Thread dikshie
, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1000ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.920/1.857/2.795/0.938 ms ------ -- -dikshie-

Re: ipv6 static routing

2013-12-08 Thread dikshie
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Marios Makassikis wrote: > Is PF enabled ? If so, perhaps your current rules are IPv4 only. > Can you ping6 from this host ? pf is disable. # ndp -a Neighbor Linklayer Address Netif ExpireS Flags 2001:d30:101:624::64

Re: ipv6 static routing

2013-12-08 Thread dikshie
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Marios Makassikis wrote: > Your /etc/mygate file can look like this : > > # cat /etc/mygate > 202.249.25.1 > FE80::21B:2AFF:FEE2:A4C0%vio1 > Make sure you have net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf same result with previous one. # ndp -a Neighbor

ipv6 static routing

2013-12-08 Thread dikshie
3:6de%vio1 0:16:3e:e3:6:de vio1 permanent R fe80::21b:2aff:fee2:a4c0%vio10:1b:2a:e2:a4:c0vio1 2sD R fe80::1%lo0 (incomplete) lo0 permanent R do I miss something here? thanks! -- -dikshie-