-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanasis wrote:
Is there a port of the apcupsd or any other daemon for ups on openbsd?
nut works well. Takes a bit of reading, if you're coming from apcupsd,
but it's very flexible.
- --
David Talkington
dt...@drizzle.com
- --
PGP key:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Furman wrote:
If you like troubleshooting then OpenBSD is going to be no fun for you.
OpenBSD Just Works
You'll also find that your best friend is 'man' instead of 'google'.
That's an adjustment that takes time for Linux refugees ... ;-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is FYI in case it interests anyone. I've given up on this board
and will be exhanging it.
Boots and runs: 4.4-i386
Fails to boot: 4.4-amd64, 4.5-i386, 4.5-amd64.
The amd64 disks will get to fdc0... and then hang indefinitely.
4.5-i386
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henning Brauer wrote:
the wrong design that sendmail abondoned long ago.
... unlike sendmail's preprocessed configuration file, to which it
clings tenaciously.
Seriously, having to chase down a source file to make configuration
changes is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Maurice Janssen maur...@z74.net wrote:
=== libexec/ld.so
/bin/sh: cd: /usr/src/libexec/ld.so - No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
The mirror is broken because rsync, in its infinite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liam J. Foy wrote:
Yes, we are pleased to be a new reseller based in the UK (we serve
Europe too of course! - the 'we' bit is a close friend who is involved
in distribution in the UK (which is what we're also setting up)).
We are not associated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bofh wrote:
In your case, I believe the best option is to download and donate.
The only problem is that most people forget part 2 - donate.
May I suggest a compromise? It sounds like many cannot afford the CDs
and shipping, and most who spend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Donations and sales do not mix. Businesses cannot do that. It is
either a sale, or it is a gift. Please don't confuse the two.
Depends on your status. The type of transaction I described is common
among nonprofits in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Henderson asked:
how does one increase efficiency and reduce IT costs by making things
more complicated?
And Marc Balmer adds:
And, quite obviously, reduce stability and after all security.
Apologies if this is wandering too far off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Donahue wrote:
I run OpenBSD under VMware Server and ESXi. (Both are free) It is
fairly stable and the performance isn't bad. I would recommend you use
the Other Linux (64-bit) profile so you can get access to the e1000
virtual NIC.
In an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Donahue wrote:
I don't have the VM image around any more, but I don't remember any
unexpected performance problems. The VM was acting as a firewall/DHCP
server ...
The problem was disk i/o, so you might not perceive the issue on a
firewall.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Archambault wrote:
I'm fairly confident that using anything other than the default e1000
network device with 64-bit guests is discouraged by VMWare.
It would appear that you're correct. Though the documentation does not
make that clear, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salutations --
I see that the vic(4) driver is still not in amd64/conf/GENERIC. Has
anyone any recent experience with this driver+platform, or know whether
its absence reflects a known problem or just lack of testing?
For the record, it works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dt...@drizzle.com wrote:
This occurs when building xenocara after updating /usr/src, /usr/ports,
/usr/xenocara to -stable from cvs and successfully building kernel and src:
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salutations --
This occurs when building xenocara after updating /usr/src, /usr/ports,
/usr/xenocara to -stable from cvs and successfully building kernel and
src:
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salutations --
The archive of ports-security shows the last post to be from January
2006.
What is the appropriate channel through which to receive security
notices regarding ports and packages?
Cheers -d
David Talkington
dt...@drizzle.com
-
16 matches
Mail list logo