ncdu -x /" and see what is taking so much space.
--
.-.---.------.-.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address| .-. opensource |
| +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | Akacjowa 10a; 55-330 | oo| supporter |
| https://bofc.pl `.--
mnt. mkdir it and
> that shoukd fix the problem.
Yup, that was the problem. Thank you!
Guess I must have removed it at some point from my rootfs.
Thanks again for the help Stuart.
--
.-.---.--.-.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address| .-.
eplacing all "() {" with "() {\nset -x" will do the trick?
--
.-----.---.--.-.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address| .-. opensource |
| +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | Akacjowa 10a; 55-330 | oo| supporter |
| https://bofc.pl `.--
4
> boot>
When system is booted root disk is sd0
> # mount | grep sd0a
> # /dev/sd0a on / type ffs (local)
I don't know what else might be usefull. I have no idea what else I can
do here :(
--
.-.---.--.-.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address| .-. opensource |
| +48 727 564 419 | S
t" and see if you can do something that way. (e.g. standard
> bandwidth is slower, but allow a fast initial burst). But you'll probably
> need to do that with separate queues per IP and it gets to be a pain.
I found some sites with ip ranges for netflix and youtube, they are quite
broa
Any ideas? Maybe I didn't read something carefully enough?
--
.-.---.-.--.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address | .-. open source |
| +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | Leszczynskiego 4/29 | oo|
t will probably never get faster than 20Mbps each.
Thanks for explanation and opening my eyes:)
--
.-----.---.-.--.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address | .-. open source |
| +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | L
things and I should
go with routing way:)
Thanks in advance for any help with this.
--
.-.---.-.--.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux | Company Address | .-. open source |
| +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer
On 2018-09-20 09:13:42, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:32:40PM +0200, michal.lyszc...@bofc.pl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've stumbled upon a weird problem. Long story short, I try to open
> > fifo two times, once O_WRONLY and once O_RDONLY, both in separate
> > threads - but
Hello,
I've stumbled upon a weird problem. Long story short, I try to open
fifo two times, once O_WRONLY and once O_RDONLY, both in separate
threads - but on process. Unfortunately both threads are locked in
open() functions.
I prepared very small program that reproduces this problem for me,
10 matches
Mail list logo