Re: Strange c++ compilation

2012-12-03 Thread rustyBSD
Le 01/12/2012 22:31, Philip Guenther a écrit : > Neither. The OpenBSD developers think that that's a useless** warning > and aren't interested in making the system header files that much > harder to read just to make it go away. > > What problem are you trying to solve by using -Wredundant-decls?

Strange c++ compilation

2012-12-01 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, I have the file test.cpp, containingonly: #include int main() { } Icompile it with $ g++ -Wredundant-decls -o test test.cpp And I get In file included from /usr/include/g++/amd64-unknown-openbsd5.2/bits/gthr-default.h:44, from /usr/include/g++/amd64-unknown

Re: ATI Radeon HD6570

2012-11-23 Thread rustyBSD
Le 24/11/2012 02:21, Nigel Taylor a écrit : > Your audio is being picked up already as 6670, audio was added together > with the video for a 6670 card. There maybe a range of cards that use > the same id for audio. > > To recreate the includes. > cd /usr/src/sys/dev/pci > make > > Now follow inst

Re: ATI Radeon HD6570

2012-11-23 Thread rustyBSD
Le 23/11/2012 21:44, Nigel Taylor a écrit : > On 11/23/12 16:56, rustyBSD wrote: >> Le 23/11/2012 17:35, Nigel Taylor a écrit : >>> That is not a REDWOOD chip, it's TURKS, and both should be supported, >> >> Ahh yes I didn't see this in xorg.0.log >&

Re: ATI Radeon HD6570

2012-11-23 Thread rustyBSD
Le 23/11/2012 17:35, Nigel Taylor a écrit : > That is not a REDWOOD chip, it's TURKS, and both should be supported, Ahh yes I didn't see this in xorg.0.log > the man page is wrong 6570 occurs both under REDWOOD and TURKS. > REDWOOD are 5x50 series. Could still be in the wrong chip family. > > Th

ATI Radeon HD6570

2012-11-23 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, I have an ATI Radeon HD6570 card. Dmesg gives me: vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 vendor "ATI", unknown product 0x6759 rev 0x00 and the driver used seems to be VESA. I naturally changed to: --- src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs 2012-11-17 16:42:29.0 +0100 +++ src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs 2012-

bsd_auth(3) question

2012-11-10 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, is there a wayto useauth_userokay()without setgid to "auth" ? When testing this code: #include #include #include #include #include int main() { printf("authentication "); char *user = strdup("me"); char *pass = strdup("pass"); if (!auth_userokay(user, NULL, "auth-mytes

Re: CPU max frequency

2012-10-30 Thread rustyBSD
Le 30/10/2012 09:19, Remco a écrit : > AFAICT these dmesg lines tell me the possible frequency settings of my CPU: > > $ dmesg |grep acpicpu > acpicpu0 at acpi0: FVS, 2400, 1600 MHz > acpicpu1 at acpi0: FVS, 2400, 1600 MHz It doesn't give me the frequency. > Is that what you're after ? In fact, I

CPU max frequency

2012-10-29 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, that's maybe a stupid question, but how can I get the max frequency of my cpu ? I saw sysctl has hw.cpuspeed and hw.setperf, but can I get the maximum frequency without setting setperf to 100%, getting cpuspeed and then restoring setperf to the value it has before ? Thanks !

Re: Question about the code

2012-10-08 Thread rustyBSD
Le 07/10/2012 14:58, rustyBSD a écrit : > On 10/07/12 13:41, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> If you type "unbound" into google, you will see that >> this is upstream code that is incorporated into OpenBSD. >> >> Therefore, you should really contact that project. > A

Re: Question about the code

2012-10-07 Thread rustyBSD
On 10/07/12 13:41, Theo de Raadt wrote: > If you type "unbound" into google, you will see that > this is upstream code that is incorporated into OpenBSD. > > Therefore, you should really contact that project. Already done

Question about the code

2012-10-06 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, it's about src/usr.sbin/unbound/ldns/drill/work.c at line 184: What is the 'fp' FILE used for ? Here - if I'm not mistaken - we fopen() filename, and that's it. We don't use the 'fp' variable, and we never fclose() it. Am I wrong ? Thanks

Re: Off-by-one overflow (?)

2012-09-03 Thread rustyBSD
Le 03/09/2012 22:22, Otto Moerbeek a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:19:44PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 04:37:42PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: >> >>> /usr/src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.c >>> lines: 333 & 1092 & 1096 >>

Re: Off-by-one overflow (?)

2012-09-03 Thread rustyBSD
Le 03/09/2012 16:46, bert a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 04:37:42PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: >> /usr/src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.c >> lines: 333 & 1092 & 1096 >> >> Is this me, or these strncpy() may cause off-by-one >> overflows ? No i'm wrong,

Off-by-one overflow (?)

2012-09-03 Thread rustyBSD
/usr/src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.c lines: 333 & 1092 & 1096 Is this me, or these strncpy() may cause off-by-one overflows ? In an use like this: strncpy(a, b, sizeof(a)); the null terminator will be added beyond the end of a if b has the same size (or a larger size). Should use something lik

Re: Bad malloc (?)

2012-09-02 Thread rustyBSD
Le 02/09/2012 20:36, Otto Moerbeek a écrit : > Confusing errno and exit code. Just use 1. Or err(1, NULL). The > default message is clear enough. I use errno because most of other calls to err() in this file use errno too.

Re: Bad malloc (?)

2012-09-02 Thread rustyBSD
Le 02/09/2012 16:06, rustyBSD a écrit : > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-patch which had a name of > scsi.c.diff] Mmhhh... --- scsi.cSun Sep 2 15:47:45 2012 +++ scsi.cSun Sep 2 16:00:42 2012 @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ case 'z': {

Re: Bad malloc (?)

2012-09-02 Thread rustyBSD
Le 02/09/2012 14:57, Alexander Hall a écrit : > Whoever it is, I'm sure he or she appreciate diffs anyway! Ok, here is one. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-patch which had a name of scsi.c.diff]

Re: Bad malloc (?)

2012-09-02 Thread rustyBSD
Le 01/09/2012 19:59, Kenneth R Westerback a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:19:25PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: >> Hi, >> in /usr/src/sbin/scsi/scsi.c line 225, why >> is the malloc not checked ? ... If it fails, >> it overflows, no ? >> > Crufty old code. Feel

Bad malloc (?)

2012-09-01 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, in /usr/src/sbin/scsi/scsi.c line 225, why is the malloc not checked ? ... If it fails, it overflows, no ?

Re: Full Disc Encryption - i want your opinions

2012-07-20 Thread rustyBSD
Le 20/07/2012 11:12, Wojciech Puchar a écrit : > Many today SSD and some magnetic disks have AES-128/256 encryption > builtin. > > If BIOS supports it, it ask for password then send it to hard disk > after which it decodes it's AES key so it start to work. > > No software crypto overhead, everythin

Re: Kernel Panic (?)(!)

2012-07-05 Thread rustyBSD
Le 05/07/2012 17:06, Daniel Bolgheroni a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:33:37PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: >> Fine ? How could I know ? I get "operation not supported by device" when >> trying to read smart infos with smartctl. >> In all cases, even if my disk

Re: Kernel Panic (?)(!)

2012-07-05 Thread rustyBSD
Le 05/07/2012 16:13, Daniel Bolgheroni a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:28:06PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: >> Question: should I report a bug ? > Are you sure your disk is fine? > > Fine ? How could I know ? I get "operation not supported by device" when trying to re

Kernel Panic (?)(!)

2012-07-05 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, When I download from my OpenBSD server a lot of files with sftp, it crashes with Kernel Panic (disk error). I tested two times, and two times it crashed. I get a message telling: "panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "ccb->ccb_xa.state == ATA_S_ONCHIP" failed: file "../../../../dev/pci/ahci.c", l