is there any other way of getting ftp+ssl to pass normally on a bsd box? 

soul.


Die Gestalt wrote:
> 
> All I can tell you is I had for a while a ftp + ssl server running
> (and yes ftp + ssl is useful in some scenarii) behind a pf machine and
> it all worked perfectly well.
> 
> The problem is that you get first a SSL handshake and then all the
> rest is ciphered, preveting ftp-proxy from doing its work.
> 
> You may need  to do the following:
> 
> - restrict the data ports of the ftp server to a certain range (for
> example 40000 to 45000)
> - open these ports on the pf machine (bypassing the ftp proxy behaviour)
> - have the ftp server listen on a port other than 21
> 
> If you wanted ftp-proxy to work transparently with SSL it would have
> to proxy the SSL handshake as well which might be a problem in terms
> of security since the data flow would exist in clear (somewhere in
> memory) on the proxy.
> 
> On 7/31/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A client of ours (don't ask) has been sold by somebody else on the
>> idea that FTP over SSL (afaik implemented with some Microsoft system
>> or other) is the way to go.
>>
>> Now FTP over SSL seems to be a variant which isn't obviously well
>> supported other than a few experimental clients, and with a fairly
>> straightforward 4.1 pf + ftp-proxy setup (close enough to the one in
>> the tutorial[1]) near the client end, what I get is that the client
>> and server happily clear authetication, but do not manage to set up
>> their SSL connection.
>>
>> What I get from ftp-proxy is a sequence of
>>
>> Jul 31 10:49:27 delilah ftp-proxy[15797]: #1 client command too long or
>> not clean
>>
>> with incrementing # numbers, until the partners give up.
>>
>> The 'techies' at the other end seem to have problems with concepts
>> such a server tunables, so the question is, is there some obvious
>> ftp-proxy workaround I've missed (other than the even more obvious
>> 'use something else')?
>>
>> - P
>>
>> [1] http://home.nuug.no/~/peter/pf/, specifically
>>    http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/newftpproxy.html
>>
>> --
>> Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
>> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/
>> http://www.nuug.no/
>> "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
>> delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/ftp-proxy-vs-%22FTP-over-SSL%22-tf4191916.html#a11980071
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to