On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Foo74 wrote:
>
> Thanks for posting the response. Do you know what from the error message
> shows that it was a -current build? I think I would have spent days figuring
> that out. :)
Replying to list as well- There were two clues. One was how uname -a
reported
>Your package path points to 6.0- release. But your error messages
> indicate you've installed a snapshot of -current, the development
> breach. Use snapshot packages, or install the release.
Thanks! You're right, I had intended to install 6.0 from release, but
ended up getting a snapshot ISO. I'l
I'm installing OpenBSD i386 on a fresh new hard drive, I've set PKG_PATH,
and I can't add packages- my tries give errors about quirks. Trying a
bare "pkg_add quirks" tells me:
# pkg_add quirks
Error from http://mirrors.mit.edu/pub/OpenBSD/6.0/packages/i386/quirks-2.241.tgz
unsigned package
Can't f
Thanks all for the tuning flags & the example. I'll take a look at the man
pages and file set. Doesn't look like the 4TB FFS2 will be a problem on
this machine after all.
I'm setting up an openBSD 5.6 box with a 4TB raid to back up a video
editing cluster. I'll be using BackupPC which likes to have a single
large volume so it can de-duplicate files using hard links. Thus the
main volume will be all the 4TB.
I know FFS2 can handle that size easily, but I'm worried a
>On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:57:42AM -0700, yary wrote:
>> I have installed my own build of perl into /usr/local which might be
>> the cause- though it can also happen with the system perl, All one has
>> to do is install a binary/XS version of a library that system perl has
&g
Hi,
I saw another message about getting a perl error 'Fatal error: can't
parse object version..." after an upgrade to 4.9, and have a fix and
an explanation.
Fix: add this line:
no lib qw(/usr/local/libdata/perl5
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/i386-openbsd/5.12.2
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl
On 22/01/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:42:03PM -0800, yary wrote:
For real virtual stuff, qemu works well - although not exactly swiftly.
It's usable for testing, but don't try to run it in production.
If you can handle being a lit
On 22/01/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
qemu is less elegant than, say, dfbsd virtual kernels but it works
pretty well.
Hadn't heard about DragonFly virtual kernels, they do look cool, but
they aren't yet ready for prime time and there isn't anything like it
in OpenBSD! Still t
Hello,
wondering what state-of-the-art is for running virtual machines under
OpenBSD. I don't see anything with particularly good performance (like
Solairs "zones"), which would be great, but anything resonable would
work for my purposes- I don't really need the blazing speed. I want to
run a few
You want more donations, you put the donations link in more places.
Yes it's easy for someone looking for it to find it- but how about the
businessman whose sysadmin just said "we should look at openBSD 3.9"-
he'll search for & see that 3.9 release page, and not know that his
department is about to
On 3/7/06, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yary wrote:
> > Pardon me for giving what may be a naive answer, but how about putting
> > /usr/local/lib into the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable before starting
> > the wanrouter script?
>
>
On 3/7/06, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm working on getting the Sangoma WANPIPE driver working under OpenBSD
> 3.8 (mostly
> working) and ran into a couple of little problems that I'm trying to find the
> "right" way
> to solve.
>
>The preferred setup is to run thei
I'll second the observation that hot machines flake in odd ways. It's
not just the processor- hot memory is also unpredictable- hard drive
controllers- "northbridge"- you name it- there are many essential
parts that can overheat and cause you hard-to-diagnose grief.
If cooling your machine doesn't
On 2/16/06, yo2lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a dhcp server with following configuration:
>
> /etc/dhcpd.conf
>
> shared-network LOCAL-NET {
>option domain-name "my.domain";
>option domain-name-servers 193.231.249.1;
>
>subnet 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
On 2/13/06, yary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, can one use a group name to set up a pool? eg:
> rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 80 { httpd_ifs_group }
> round-robin
just read the referenced post from Henning- looks like my answer is "yes"!
On 2/13/06, Ray Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> In this example ifconfig(8) shows that I have groups ``lo'' and
> ``egress'', so in the pf.conf you can stick an interface group
> (almost?) anywhere you can stick an interface. (Actually there's
> a missing interface group in this example: ``en
You can search for a thread on this list with the subject "how to
manage big pf-rulesets in a comfortable way" - someone posted their
makefile for adding a macro set to the start of pf rulesets.
It's been a while since I've had the opportunity to code in RPG.
Implementing an SMP kernel in an old IBM report generating language is
an interesting challenge, and would open up the possibility of running
OpenBSD 4.0 on card-sorting machines.
My longish question left out critical pieces- the actual /etc/ files
(pf.conf, hostname.*, bridgename.*) and tcpdump logs, I apologize.
Thanks for reading and replying despite that. I'll be going another
round tonight, and will follow up with concrete examples to the pf
list, with a brief summary h
I've struggled for a couple days configuring an OpenBSD
router/firewall and would like some help from the experts.
Short version: There's an internal network with voice-over-IP phones
and PCs. The phones have publicly routable addresses, and for them,
the OpenBSD router should act like an addressl
21 matches
Mail list logo
