* Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org [2012-01-03 19:00]:
Well because for me 80:82 is (80, 81, 82) and 82:80 the same
items and so the same range.
but it is NOT the same. I'd claim your expectations is strange ;)
So what is the meaning for PF of the range 82:80? If this is a non
sense,
Hello, happy new year.
I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges, for
example with an exclude boundary range : port1 port2
PF or pfctl does not check that port1 = port2 and if port1 port2 the
port range is not correct.
For example 82 80 is not the same as 80 82 (but
* Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org [2012-01-03 17:45]:
I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges, for
example with an exclude boundary range : port1 port2
nope.
Ports and ranges of ports are specified using these operators:
:
For those of us playing the CS home game. Is this an example of
left-to right evaluation? My thought on this was that the value 81
isn't greater than 82 and isn't less than 80, so the rule doesn't
match.
Le Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:54:18 +0100,
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de a icrit :
Hello,
* Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org [2012-01-03 17:45]:
I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges,
for example with an exclude boundary range : port1 port2
nope.
5 matches
Mail list logo
