On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> quit using the site without the www's. :)
Yes, I've made a mental note to that effect and already edited my bookmarks.
> .openbsd.org is not the source and never was (at least in the ten
> years I've been on the project).
That 'splains it :
On 09/28/2011 03:42 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
The site at http://.openbsd.org is not in sync with
http://www.openbsd.org/.
yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times.
Found a thread from 2007 where Theo st
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> The site at http://openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/.
>
> yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times.
Found a thread from 2007 where Theo states "www.openbsd.org is a
mirror on a good
> The site at http://openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/.
yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Yes, it happens when you start out. Look Nick added this because of you :-)
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919
Thank you Nick :)
However, I just realized that:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919
is not the sa
On 2011-09-23, Chris Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Brynet wrote:
>> you may be able to extract the comp set
>
> I did extract the comp set from the latest snapshot and gcc-4.x was returned.
> However, once again the kernel compiled fine but received the same
> error with the use
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Mmmm are you on alpha or landisk that you follow those instructions?
No, but I think a landshark was knocking at the door at the time and
interrupted my train of thought :)
In reality, the instructions weren't labelled for any particular
arc
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Chris Smith
wrote:
> It seems I've followed the instructions labelled "2011/09/19 - thread
> model posix enabled for gcc 3" at
> http://openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919 and mistakenly so which
> is probably why userland wont build as that process has replaced
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Brynet wrote:
> you may be able to extract the comp set
I did extract the comp set from the latest snapshot and gcc-4.x was returned.
However, once again the kernel compiled fine but received the same
error with the userland,
Chris
>> It seems I've [blindly] followed the instructions ...
>
> Hah. Whoops.
yeah... what were you thinking!
>> If indeed that is the case, the question is, how do I get gcc-4.x back ?
>
> It would be easier to reinstall, but you may be able to extract the comp set
> and pray to santa it works.
>
o
> It seems I've [blindly] followed the instructions ...
Hah. Whoops.
> If indeed that is the case, the question is, how do I get gcc-4.x back ?
It would be easier to reinstall, but you may be able to extract the comp set
and pray to santa it works.
-Bryan.
It seems I've followed the instructions labelled "2011/09/19 - thread
model posix enabled for gcc 3" at
http://openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919 and mistakenly so which
is probably why userland wont build as that process has replaced
gcc-4.x with gcc-3.x.
If indeed that is the case, the questi
Problems building -current userland:
==
===> libcurses
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses-c codes.c -o codes.o
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses-c comp_captab.c -o
comp_captab.o
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses-c expan
13 matches
Mail list logo
