Re: .../i386/SHA256 not sorted?

2010-02-24 Thread Jan Stary
On Feb 24 23:22:20, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010-02-24, Jan Stary wrote: > > My snapshot downloading script just complained > > that there is a difference between i386/SHA256 > > and the result of running > > > > cat index.txt | grep -Fv SHA256 | xargs cksum -a sha256 > > ouch. try 'cksum -

Re: .../i386/SHA256 not sorted?

2010-02-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-02-24, Jan Stary wrote: > My snapshot downloading script just complained > that there is a difference between i386/SHA256 > and the result of running > > cat index.txt | grep -Fv SHA256 | xargs cksum -a sha256 ouch. try 'cksum -c SHA256'...

.../i386/SHA256 not sorted?

2010-02-24 Thread Jan Stary
My snapshot downloading script just complained that there is a difference between i386/SHA256 and the result of running cat index.txt | grep -Fv SHA256 | xargs cksum -a sha256 in the i386 directory. The difference is exactly this: 16a17 > SHA256 (install47.iso) = > 7105afbd45e11072347ce43bcae9