Re: 4.4 on ESXi 3.5 (was: vic(4) on amd64)

2009-03-11 Thread SJP Lists
2009/3/12 : > I discovered a severe performance problem, wherein an OpenBSD guest would > run fine for some period of hours, and then become horribly bogged down > during disk operations, to the point of unusability. This was true even > when the guest was nearly idle and the VM host had abundan

Re: 4.4 on ESXi 3.5 (was: vic(4) on amd64)

2009-03-11 Thread Guilherme Malschitzky Schroeder
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Josh Archambault wrote: > >> I'm fairly confident that using anything other than the default "e1000" >> network device with 64-bit guests is discouraged by VMWare. > > It would appear that you're correct

4.4 on ESXi 3.5 (was: vic(4) on amd64)

2009-03-11 Thread dtalk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josh Archambault wrote: I'm fairly confident that using anything other than the default "e1000" network device with 64-bit guests is discouraged by VMWare. It would appear that you're correct. Though the documentation does not make that clear, I