On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:15:25PM +0200, Federico wrote:
> Rosen Iliev wrote:
> > Hi Federico,
> >
> > Did you try to change the balancing mode to ip-unicast or ip-stealth?
> >
> > from man carp(4)
>
> I just tried with ip-unicast, but both machines stop working.
> Do I have to think it's a swi
Rosen Iliev wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> Did you try to change the balancing mode to ip-unicast or ip-stealth?
>
> from man carp(4)
I just tried with ip-unicast, but both machines stop working.
Do I have to think it's a switch related problem?
With ip-stealth, always only one machine replies (unti
Hi Federico,
Did you try to change the balancing mode to ip-unicast or ip-stealth?
from man carp(4)
IP balancing is activated by setting the *balancing* mode to /ip/. This is
the recommended default setting. In this mode, carp uses a multicast MAC
address, so that a switch sends incoming traf
> active/active pfsync works absolutely fine, if you have some way to
> send traffic to both firewalls. one way you can do that is if you run
> OSPF on the firewalls and the router/s in front of them and enable
> multipath.
Ok, but I'd like that firewalls share their load, so the traffic coming
fr
On 2009-07-15, Federico wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> looks like the same thing as in PR 6084.
>
>
> Yes, but it's still in open state, noone replied at that ticket.
yes, nobody fixed it yet.
> Besides, dlg worte about active/active in 4.6 introducing the "defer"
> tag, as you can see he
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> looks like the same thing as in PR 6084.
Yes, but it's still in open state, noone replied at that ticket.
Besides, dlg worte about active/active in 4.6 introducing the "defer"
tag, as you can see here:
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090619100514
but
On 2009-07-13, Federico wrote:
> Federico wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after some disastrous test with OBSD 4.5, i tried to upgrade to -current
>> via cvs, then to download the latest snapshot of 4.6 release from the ftp.
>>
>> My goal is to obtain a couple of firewall in active/active mode with
>>
Federico wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after some disastrous test with OBSD 4.5, i tried to upgrade to -current
> via cvs, then to download the latest snapshot of 4.6 release from the ftp.
>
> My goal is to obtain a couple of firewall in active/active mode with
> load balancing enabled, but at now I'm un
Hi all,
after some disastrous test with OBSD 4.5, i tried to upgrade to -current
via cvs, then to download the latest snapshot of 4.6 release from the ftp.
My goal is to obtain a couple of firewall in active/active mode with
load balancing enabled, but at now I'm unable to make it works.
As I a
9 matches
Mail list logo
