hmm, on Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:12:28AM -0300, Andris Delfino said that
+Note that less than and greater than signs below MUST be removed;
+they are there for you to enter your own information.
...
- * Copyright (c) CCYY YOUR NAME HERE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * Copyright (c) YEAR YOUR NAME
AndrC)s Delfino wrote:
Maybe it may help someone, :P
--- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 10:00:22 2006
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
should be separated by a comma, e.g.
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004
+Note that less than and greater than signs
If you talk about obvious things, then a four-digit year is an obvious
one... A two-digit one is stupid (maybe Jesus left some hack?)...
On 1/30/06, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AndrC)s Delfino wrote:
Maybe it may help someone, :P
--- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:37:07PM -0300, Andr??s Delfino wrote:
Or... somehow I changed that word when sending the message. Anyway,
this is the correct diff:
--- license.templateTue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 12:33:55 2006
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
should be
Maybe it may help someone, :P
--- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 10:00:22 2006
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
should be separated by a comma, e.g.
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004
+Note that less than and greater than signs below MUST be removed;
+they are
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:12:28AM -0300, Andris Delfino wrote:
Maybe it may help someone, :P
--- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 10:00:22 2006
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
should be separated by a comma, e.g.
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004
+Note
yes, I haven't that typo in the original file, sorry, :P
On 1/29/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:12:28AM -0300, Andris Delfino wrote:
Maybe it may help someone, :P
--- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan
Or... somehow I changed that word when sending the message. Anyway,
this is the correct diff:
--- license.templateTue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 12:33:55 2006
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
should be separated by a comma, e.g.
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004
+Note that less
Should I do that diff then?
On 1/29/06, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:35:56 -0300
AndrC)s Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or... somehow I changed that word when sending the message. Anyway,
this is the correct diff:
--- license.template
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:12:28 -0300, AndrC)s Delfino wrote:
Maybe it may help someone, :P
--- license.template Tue Jun 3 19:37:00 2003
+++ license.template.1 Sun Jan 29 10:00:22 2006
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
should be separated by a comma, e.g.
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004
+Note that less
On 1/29/06, Rod.. Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A legal pedant once informed me that (c) is not a valid copyright
mark. He says that the only valid marks are the C-in-a-circle character
or (copr).
It probably isn't uniform but the Berne Convention may have some rules.
As usual IANAL so
11 matches
Mail list logo