Re: ARM or SPARC ?

2011-05-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-05-30, hvom .org wrote: > Hi all > > I need best performance processor, I used firewall and > rountig/load-balancing. I look models ARM and SPARC, ARM it's the best > SPARC. The machin turned OpenBSD 4.9. OpenBSD on the current supported ARM systems are not at all fast on the network. You

Re: ARM or SPARC ?

2011-05-30 Thread Francois Pussault
is more important if you need performance. A fast processor on bad board will do permanently "nop"(No operation) instruction so it is a bad choice for performances. > > From: hvom .org > Sent: Mon May 30 11:32:20 CEST 2011 > To: >

Re: ARM or SPARC ?

2011-05-30 Thread Joel Wiramu Pauling
Sparc64 is probably the best support non x86 architecture for openbsd at this time. On 30 May 2011 21:41, Daniel Gracia wrote: > Kinda naive question: either could be more than enough; depends on your > hard/soft/bandwith combination. > > Stick to i386/amd64; usually the best buck for performan

Re: ARM or SPARC ?

2011-05-30 Thread Daniel Gracia
Kinda naive question: either could be more than enough; depends on your hard/soft/bandwith combination. Stick to i386/amd64; usually the best buck for performance ratio. Good luck! El 30/05/2011 11:32, hvom .org escribis: Hi all I need best performance processor, I used firewall and rountig/

ARM or SPARC ?

2011-05-30 Thread hvom .org
Hi all I need best performance processor, I used firewall and rountig/load-balancing. I look models ARM and SPARC, ARM it's the best SPARC. The machin turned OpenBSD 4.9. Tank you for help Cordialy