On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 1:33 AM, andrew fabbro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, wrote:
>
>> I live in NJ. Should I be this paranoid, that every file I edit should
> be
>> encrypted?
>> Who has time for this type of craziness?
>
> Well, no one. I encrypt very few files.
I think that's
> Is there no middle ground between an encrypted partition and plain text?
Adding low-grade encrypt-with-password to lots of utilities like this
does not make sense.
There's already a kitchen sink, it's called emacs.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, wrote:
> I live in NJ. Should I beâ this paranoid, that every file I edit should
be
> encrypted?
> Who has time for this type of craziness?
>
Well, no one. I encrypt very few files.
But keeping one's passwords and related administrivia safe, preventing
unenc
@openbsd.org
Subject: Adding encryption support to vi(1)
vim (in ports) offers an encryption option (
http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption)
Invoking vim with -x prompts for a key and then encrypts the file on save.
It appears to do the right thing as far as encrypting the
>vim (in ports) offers an encryption option (
>http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption)
>
>Invoking vim with -x prompts for a key and then encrypts the file on save.
>It appears to do the right thing as far as encrypting the .swp (temporary
>recovery) file as well. If you lat
vim (in ports) offers an encryption option (
http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption)
Invoking vim with -x prompts for a key and then encrypts the file on save.
It appears to do the right thing as far as encrypting the .swp (temporary
recovery) file as well. If you later edi
7 matches
Mail list logo
