Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
On Thu, 25.11.2010 at 14:29:39 +, Michal wrote: > >Because your setup should rather look like this? > > > >Internet --- switch --- host1 --- switch --- LAN > > + --- host2 + > This is what I was trying to get at...the way you draw your diagram, > I can't understand what y

Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Michal
On 25/11/10 13:20, Robert Hoffmann wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:22:13 +0100 Toni Mueller wrote: Internet --- host1 host2 Because your setup should rather look like this? Internet --- switch --- host1 --- switch --- LAN + --- host2 + regards, Robert This is w

Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Robert Hoffmann
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:22:13 +0100 Toni Mueller wrote: > Internet --- host1 host2 Because your setup should rather look like this? Internet --- switch --- host1 --- switch --- LAN + --- host2 + regards, Robert

Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
On Thu, 25.11.2010 at 13:15:06 +, Michal wrote: > On 25/11/10 12:22, Toni Mueller wrote: > >I discover that CARP and routing don't always mix well: > > > > Internet --- host1 host2 > Wait, do you mean; > > >

Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Michal
On 25/11/10 12:22, Toni Mueller wrote: Hi, I discover that CARP and routing don't always mix well: Internet --- host1 host2 If host1 and host2 have a CARP interface with the same IP, then packets destined for that IP don't ever reach host2, even if the interface on host1 is

CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I discover that CARP and routing don't always mix well: Internet --- host1 host2 If host1 and host2 have a CARP interface with the same IP, then packets destined for that IP don't ever reach host2, even if the interface on host1 is in BACKUP state. Kind regards, --Toni++