"One could easily poke holes in this complaint; the characterization
of PAM as "modern" is somewhat amusing; it is 1990s technology."
Dafuk. If he's going to nitpick, then so am I. Marc did not say PAM
was modern. He mentioned a modern Linux distro with pulseaudio, pam
and systemd - to infer th
You missed the point.
This is a joke.
Rod was making a joke by pointing out how F** retarded these people
are.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012, at 02:21 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Rod Whitworth
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:49:37 -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
> You missed the point.
> This is a joke.
> Rod was making a joke by pointing out how F** retarded these people
> are.
i'm going to pretend that you pointed out that cgroups prevent
double-forking from being a factor whereas pgroups do not
On Nov 17, 2012, at 3:49 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/524606/
>
> don't have a subscription but for those who do, enjoy.
I like Jonathan's work, but this article is ill-conceived. He picks
up on Marc's upstream vendor remarks, then turns this into an issue
of BSD does not
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:49:37 -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>
>>https://lwn.net/Articles/524606/
>>
>>don't have a subscription but for those who do, enjoy.
>>
>
> But http://lwn.net/Articles/524920/ will give you the idea without $$$
"rleigh,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:49:37 -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>https://lwn.net/Articles/524606/
>
>don't have a subscription but for those who do, enjoy.
>
But http://lwn.net/Articles/524920/ will give you the idea without $$$
R/
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I subscribed to the list.
Mail to t
https://lwn.net/Articles/524606/
don't have a subscription but for those who do, enjoy.
7 matches
Mail list logo
