On 01/02/2006 03:31:10 AM, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
Although it's rather hypothetical to have two broken switches
at the same time, your assumptions are correct.
The backup will not take over.
It is rather hypothetical, but perhaps not as much as you
might think. I have already, during peri
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 10:52:43PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 01/01/2006 03:09:03 PM, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:28:42AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >[...]
> >> Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
> >> other with carp. (net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on
On 01/01/2006 03:09:03 PM, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:28:42AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
[...]
> Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
> other with carp. (net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on
> both firewalls.) Each has 3 interfaces, internet,
> lan, and dmz. The
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:28:42AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
[...]
> Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
> other with carp. (net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on
> both firewalls.) Each has 3 interfaces, internet,
> lan, and dmz. The dmz has, say, a webserver.
> Now to connect the 2 firew
Hi,
Sorry, but I just can't seem to get (all of)
net.inet.carp.preempt from the man pages.
I could set this up and test it, but I know that
somebody's done it already and a quick search of
the list archives fails me.
Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
other with carp. (net.inet.
5 matches
Mail list logo