Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-03-07 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hello! On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:10:43PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: [...] make search key= is more or less deprecated... What exact replacement do you have in eye for the use case of finding where in the ports tree a port is (i.e. if one actually wants to use a port rather than a package)? Kind

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-03-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make search key= is more or less deprecated... Interesting, So is /usr/ports/INDEX being dumped too at some point. Or will it still have listings showing dependancies and stuff?

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-03-01 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:01:26PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: X isn't in packages, but in simple tarballs. cd / ; for i in some/path/x*.tgz; do tar xvvzpf $i; done Configure if needed, run X. Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-03-01 Thread Edd Barrett
make search key= is more or less deprecated... What is the preffered make target now? Regards Edd

Dependancies with make search key=

2006-02-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Maybe I don't understand what the dependancy lines are supposed to do. I thought they would list any dependancies. I have no part of X installed so should I see some dependancies listed here? # make search key=ratpoison Port: ratpoison-1.3.0p1 Path: x11/ratpoison Info: minimal wm

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-02-28 Thread Ray Lai
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:04:46PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: Maybe I don't understand what the dependancy lines are supposed to do. I thought they would list any dependancies. I have no part of X installed so should I see some dependancies listed here? # make search key=ratpoison

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-02-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Ray Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have no part of X installed so should I see some dependancies listed here? # make search key=ratpoison Port: ratpoison-1.3.0p1 Path: x11/ratpoison Info: minimal wm based on GNU screen Maint: William Yodlowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-02-28 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hi! On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:00:53PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: [...] So shouldn't `X' appear as a dependancy? Or whatever package supplies X? Assuming I need to backup and get the installation package *x*.tgz. I'm not sure how to proceed. I've installed from a recent snapshot and then

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-02-28 Thread Nick Holland
Harry Putnam wrote: ... So shouldn't `X' appear as a dependancy? Or whatever package supplies X? No. X is not a package. It is a file set, not part of the ports tree. Assuming I need to backup and get the installation package *x*.tgz. I'm not sure how to proceed.

Re: Dependancies with make search key=

2006-02-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: X isn't in packages, but in simple tarballs. cd / ; for i in some/path/x*.tgz; do tar xvvzpf $i; done Configure if needed, run X. Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No. X is not a package. It is a file set, not part of the ports tree.