Hello!
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:10:43PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
[...]
make search key=
is more or less deprecated...
What exact replacement do you have in eye for the use case of finding
where in the ports tree a port is (i.e. if one actually wants to use
a port rather than a package)?
Kind
Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make search key=
is more or less deprecated...
Interesting, So is /usr/ports/INDEX being dumped too at some point.
Or will it still have listings showing dependancies and stuff?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:01:26PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
X isn't in packages, but in simple tarballs.
cd / ; for i in some/path/x*.tgz; do tar xvvzpf $i; done
Configure if needed, run X.
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make search key=
is more or less deprecated...
What is the preffered make target now?
Regards
Edd
Maybe I don't understand what the dependancy lines are supposed to
do. I thought they would list any dependancies.
I have no part of X installed so should I see some dependancies listed
here?
# make search key=ratpoison
Port: ratpoison-1.3.0p1
Path: x11/ratpoison
Info: minimal wm
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:04:46PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
Maybe I don't understand what the dependancy lines are supposed to
do. I thought they would list any dependancies.
I have no part of X installed so should I see some dependancies listed
here?
# make search key=ratpoison
Ray Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no part of X installed so should I see some dependancies listed
here?
# make search key=ratpoison
Port: ratpoison-1.3.0p1
Path: x11/ratpoison
Info: minimal wm based on GNU screen
Maint: William Yodlowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:00:53PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
So shouldn't `X' appear as a dependancy? Or whatever package supplies
X?
Assuming I need to backup and get the installation package *x*.tgz. I'm not
sure how to proceed.
I've installed from a recent snapshot and then
Harry Putnam wrote:
...
So shouldn't `X' appear as a dependancy? Or whatever package supplies
X?
No.
X is not a package. It is a file set, not part of the ports tree.
Assuming I need to backup and get the installation package *x*.tgz. I'm not
sure how to proceed.
Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
X isn't in packages, but in simple tarballs.
cd / ; for i in some/path/x*.tgz; do tar xvvzpf $i; done
Configure if needed, run X.
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No.
X is not a package. It is a file set, not part of the ports tree.
10 matches
Mail list logo