Re: Does pf support NPT (RFC6296) ?

2017-05-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/05/16 21:27, Adam Thompson wrote: > > > I know I can do NAT66, but I don't think it's feasible to emulate NPT > > > using NAT66 rules. > > > > No, NPT is different and can't be emulated by anything that OpenBSD's > > PF currently does. > > Shoot. I was really hoping pfSense managed it th

Re: Does pf support NPT (RFC6296) ?

2017-05-16 Thread Adam Thompson
> > I know I can do NAT66, but I don't think it's feasible to emulate NPT > > using NAT66 rules. > > No, NPT is different and can't be emulated by anything that OpenBSD's > PF currently does. Shoot. I was really hoping pfSense managed it through some feature that predated FreeBSD's pf(4) import

Re: Does pf support NPT (RFC6296) ?

2017-05-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-05-15, Adam Thompson wrote: > I still haven't found this answer anywhere... > > Does OpenBSD (more specifically, pf(4), I guess) support RFC 6296, > IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation? Looks like FreeBSD can do it, > but I can't tell if that's something they added to their own pf f

Does pf support NPT (RFC6296) ?

2017-05-15 Thread Adam Thompson
I still haven't found this answer anywhere... Does OpenBSD (more specifically, pf(4), I guess) support RFC 6296, IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation? Looks like FreeBSD can do it, but I can't tell if that's something they added to their own pf fork, or if I'm just missing something in the