Re: Erratic NAT behaviour

2008-10-09 Thread gm_sjo
Thanks all - reducing the MTU as above did fix the issue.

Re: Erratic NAT behaviour

2008-10-09 Thread ng-sup01
Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008-10-09, gm_sjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Client appears to be able to connect to any internet host on port 80, and a 'GET /' works (albeit often to a http 1.1 error as you'd expect) - Only a couple of the website i've tried actually render in a browser, google d

Re: Erratic NAT behaviour

2008-10-09 Thread Nick Ryan
man 4 pppoe - you're missing part of the pf.conf file: MTU/MSS ISSUES Problems can arise on machines with private IPs connecting to the Inter- net via a machine running both Network Address Translation (NAT) and pppoe. Standard Ethernet uses a Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of 15

Re: Erratic NAT behaviour

2008-10-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-10-09, gm_sjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Client appears to be able to connect to any internet host on port > 80, and a 'GET /' works (albeit often to a http 1.1 error as you'd > expect) > - Only a couple of the website i've tried actually render in a > browser, google does for example.

Erratic NAT behaviour

2008-10-09 Thread gm_sjo
Hi all, I am testing my new OpenBSD router in a simple NAT configuration but I am getting some strange results. The client machine is a Windows XP laptop and the behaviour is that only a handful of websites render (google, for example), 99% that i've tried do not. FTP appears to be working fine. I