On 8/25/20 10:33 AM, jungle Boogie wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 00:05, Greg Thomas wrote:
I'm getting pretty old and struggle with stuff like this more and more these days but I
don't see what is "very difficult to follow" about the current layout, and I'm
not sure what's weird about it ei
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 08:21, Aner Perez wrote:
>
> Looks like you may have been playing with the font sizes in your browser
> preferences (e.g.
> General > Fonts and Colors > Advanced... > Monospace > Size).
I haven't changed from the default of what Firefox has. I just created
a new firefox p
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 00:05, Greg Thomas wrote:
>
> I'm getting pretty old and struggle with stuff like this more and more these
> days but I don't see what is "very difficult to follow" about the current
> layout, and I'm not sure what's weird about it either?
>>See if these photos illustrat
>FWIW firefox (79.0) renders everything correctly at any width, including
>on "device simulation" mode. I have an old Android (5.1) device around
>with a 480x854 screen and Chrome 79 also displays everything properly.
Just tested on Firefox, both on desktop and mobile (android). On desktop the
i
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 00:05, Greg Thomas wrote:
>
> I'm getting pretty old and struggle with stuff like this more and more these
> days but I don't see what is "very difficult to follow" about the current
> layout, and I'm not sure what's weird about it either?
See if these photos illustrate
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:25:36AM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
> Interesting. I used my phone a bunch to check the FAQ when I got back to
> OpenBSD a couple of months ago, and I'm checking on my phone now
> (Android/Chrome), and it still looks fine.
A bit like the OP, I wasn't specific enough, apol
Interesting. I used my phone a bunch to check the FAQ when I got back to
OpenBSD a couple of months ago, and I'm checking on my phone now
(Android/Chrome), and it still looks fine.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 1:04 AM Zé Loff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:04:57AM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:04:57AM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
> I'm getting pretty old and struggle with stuff like this more and more
> these days but I don't see what is "very difficult to follow" about the
> current layout, and I'm not sure what's weird about it either?
Indentation gets messe
I'm getting pretty old and struggle with stuff like this more and more
these days but I don't see what is "very difficult to follow" about the
current layout, and I'm not sure what's weird about it either?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:09 PM Jungle Boogie
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think it's intend
Hi,
I don't think it's intended for the file sets section of the FAQ is be
formatted so weird. If the current layout is correct, it's very
difficult to follow.
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#FilesNeeded
I think the section needs to go into the cmdbox class, such as the
simple install
10 matches
Mail list logo
