FAQ4 -vs- disklabel(8) re /tmp space?

2014-08-30 Thread Craig R. Skinner
Just an FYI;- While preparing to wipe reinstall a box with a different partitioning layout, I noticed these 2 items about /tmp space: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Partitioning o /tmp: 50M is usually many times what you should ever need, disklabel(8) AUTOMATIC DISK ALLOCATION

Re: FAQ4 -vs- disklabel(8) re /tmp space?

2014-08-30 Thread Nick Holland
On 08/30/14 06:03, Craig R. Skinner wrote: Just an FYI;- While preparing to wipe reinstall a box with a different partitioning layout, I noticed these 2 items about /tmp space: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Partitioning o /tmp: 50M is usually many times what you should ever

Re: FAQ4 -vs- disklabel(8) re /tmp space?

2014-08-30 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2014-08-30 Sat 08:19 AM |, Nick Holland wrote: Was there a point you are trying to make? No: Just an FYI;-