This is horseshit. the SORBS dialup list is inaccurate as hell.
it includes my legitimately purchased static business IP's. They are not
dialups, and it is impossible to get SORBS to correct it. It also includes
my ISP's mail server, and in any case relaying mail through a smarthost
such
I've had good results using Spamhaus XBL/SBL...if you want to be
aggressive use Spews level 2.
On Tue, November 8, 2005 08:38, Bob Beck wrote:
This is horseshit. the SORBS dialup list is inaccurate as hell.
it includes my legitimately purchased static business IP's. They are not
After talking to some folks who would be negatively impacted by
this I've decided to drop the dial-ups blacklist and hope that
greylisting catches the bulk of the spam (which for most compromised
windows hosts is the case).
- todd
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:13:50PM -0500, the unit calling itself Todd C.
Miller wrote:
The mailing list server is now using several blacklists from the
SORBS project (http://www.sorbs.net) to prevent spam. So far it
is using the SORBS zombie, spam, web form and dialup blacklists.
This
On Saturday 05 November 2005 04:35 pm, J Moore wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:13:50PM -0500, the unit calling itself Todd C.
Miller wrote:
The mailing list server is now using several blacklists from the
SORBS project (http://www.sorbs.net) to prevent spam. So far it
is using the SORBS
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:13:50PM -0500, the unit calling itself Todd C.
Miller wrote:
The mailing list server is now using several blacklists from the
SORBS project (http://www.sorbs.net) to prevent spam. So far it
is using the SORBS zombie, spam, web form and dialup blacklists.
This
The mailing list server is now using several blacklists from the
SORBS project (http://www.sorbs.net) to prevent spam. So far it
is using the SORBS zombie, spam, web form and dialup blacklists.
This does mean that people sending mail from a dynamic IP address
(cable modem, dynamic DSL or dialup)
7 matches
Mail list logo
