> :> Just like every single Firefox running on OpenBSD/amd64
> :>
> :> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 23:37:18 +1000 (+1000), Alec Taylor wrote:
> :> :Personally I'm using the Nightly builds (version 9). They're great
> :> :because they're available in native 64-bit.
> :>
> :
> :tell that to ariane@ *
Precisely.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 09:35:14 -0500 (-0500), Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> :> Just like every single Firefox running on OpenBSD/amd64
> :>
> :> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 23:37:18 +1000 (+1000), Alec Taylor wrote:
> :> :Personally I'
On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 09:35:14 -0500 (-0500), Amit Kulkarni wrote:
:> Just like every single Firefox running on OpenBSD/amd64
:>
:> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 23:37:18 +1000 (+1000), Alec Taylor wrote:
:> :Personally I'm using the Nightly builds (version 9). They're great
:> :because they're ava
> Just like every single Firefox running on OpenBSD/amd64
>
> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 23:37:18 +1000 (+1000), Alec Taylor wrote:
> :Personally I'm using the Nightly builds (version 9). They're great
> :because they're available in native 64-bit.
>
tell that to ariane@ *native 64 bit* cough cou
Just like every single Firefox running on OpenBSD/amd64
On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 23:37:18 +1000 (+1000), Alec Taylor wrote:
:Personally I'm using the Nightly builds (version 9). They're great
:because they're available in native 64-bit.
--
"I'm really enjoying not talking to you ...
Let's not
Personally I'm using the Nightly builds (version 9). They're great
because they're available in native 64-bit.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
>> know if Firefox 6 seems
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:13:21 +
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> All the desktops do use noscript though so maybe it's javascript
> related?
It is the javascript garbage collector that isn't doing its job right.
Memory allocated for pages that use javascript and refresh themself,
like monitoring or web
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:40:48 +0200
Landry Breuil wrote:
> >> Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
> >> know if Firefox 6 seems any better for you. Firefox 4+ seems to
> >> not just leak memory, but hemorrhage it. In 5 I routinely
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
>> know if Firefox 6 seems any better for you. Firefox 4+ seems to
>> not just leak memory, but hemorrhage it. In 5 I routinely hit the
>>
switched to xxxterm + adsuck which works every release better and
better. Just some IIS pages are not running because of authentication
issues which seems related to webkit. So probably chrome has some
plugin for that as no issues in chrome at all
On 9/7/11, bofh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
>> FF7 is the first FF release which pays serious attention to those
>> memory bugs, so it might help you. takes about 2-4 hrs to compile on
>> amd64.
>
> 2-4 hrs to build? When it finishes compiling there will be already firefox
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> B Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
>> know if Firefox 6 seems any better for you. B Firefox 4+ seems to
>> not just leak memory, but hemorrhage it. B In 5 I routinely hit the
>
> Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
> know if Firefox 6 seems any better for you. Firefox 4+ seems to
> not just leak memory, but hemorrhage it. In 5 I routinely hit the
> 2G data limit. FF6 is better in this regard it seems, but freezes
>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:56 PM, STeve Andre' wrote:
> In 5 I routinely hit the
> 2G data limit. FF6 is better in this regard it seems, but freezes
> the system in fits of reallocing memory, freezing OpenBSD for
> seconds at a time.
>
Ditto on both counts. FF6 doesn't run out of memory as oft
Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
know if Firefox 6 seems any better for you. Firefox 4+ seems to
not just leak memory, but hemorrhage it. In 5 I routinely hit the
2G data limit. FF6 is better in this regard it seems, but freezes
the system in fi
15 matches
Mail list logo
