Re: Handling HTTP virtual hosts with relayd

2009-12-19 Thread James Stocks
On 19 Dec 2009, at 12:18, Lars Nooden wrote: > Ben Calvert wrote: >> This is what squid is for. >> >> On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:01 AM, James Stocks wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I'm presently using Apache to reverse-proxy HTTP connections through to our >>> Microsoft IIS servers so that we do

Re: Handling HTTP virtual hosts with relayd

2009-12-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-12-19, Lars Nooden wrote: > The vulnerable machines are still accessible via the proxy, squid. > Don't fiddle with half measures, move what you have over to Apache. > Say what you have the machine for and it will be easier to find the > right software for you. It could equally be "I have

Re: Handling HTTP virtual hosts with relayd

2009-12-19 Thread Lars Nooden
Ben Calvert wrote: > This is what squid is for. > > On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:01 AM, James Stocks wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm presently using Apache to reverse-proxy HTTP connections through to our >> Microsoft IIS servers so that we don't have to expose IIS directly to > Internet >> hosts

Re: Handling HTTP virtual hosts with relayd

2009-12-18 Thread Ben Calvert
This is what squid is for. On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:01 AM, James Stocks wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm presently using Apache to reverse-proxy HTTP connections through to our > Microsoft IIS servers so that we don't have to expose IIS directly to Internet > hosts. Recently, I've been testing rel

Handling HTTP virtual hosts with relayd

2009-12-18 Thread James Stocks
Hello everyone, I'm presently using Apache to reverse-proxy HTTP connections through to our Microsoft IIS servers so that we don't have to expose IIS directly to Internet hosts. Recently, I've been testing relayd in this role. Apache can reverse-proxy requests for several internal HTTP servers t