Re: Hearbleed and OpenSSL 1.0.1c

2014-05-02 Thread Reyk Floeter
Hi, I've seen some typos of "Heartbleed" but "Hearbleed" is a good one :) On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:20:55PM +0200, Lars Bonnesen wrote: > As far as I understand, OpenSSL 1.0.1g is needed in order to be home same > reg. heartbleed. > > I know that OpenBSD's OpenSSL is a fork, and this is maybe w

Re: Hearbleed and OpenSSL 1.0.1c

2014-05-02 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Lars Bonnesen writes: > Just want to make sure if I get this right. > > Patches 007 and 008 (OpenSSL-fix) for 5.4 has been run. > > OpenBSD 5.5 install source code patch branch run and compiled. > > On both setup I get this: > > # openssl version -a > OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012 > built on: date n

Hearbleed and OpenSSL 1.0.1c

2014-05-02 Thread Lars Bonnesen
Just want to make sure if I get this right. Patches 007 and 008 (OpenSSL-fix) for 5.4 has been run. OpenBSD 5.5 install source code patch branch run and compiled. On both setup I get this: # openssl version -a OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012 built on: date not available platform: information not ava