Humppa Validation

2006-05-31 Thread J.C. Roberts
Humppa Validation While testing out the ami.c patch for dlg@, I once again needed validate files are being written correctly. Keeping with the OpenBSD theme, I used the MP3 files created from my Elakelaiset "Werbung Baby" CD for testing out the 480GB RAID5 volume. Once you've got

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:58:42PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: > > The problems start if you're dumb enough to keep the original copy of > your humppa on something other than a BSD system... > > Since you can install OpenSSL on a number of different types of systems, > my first thought was to use

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:11:07 +0100, Jason McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:58:42PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: >> >> The problems start if you're dumb enough to keep the original copy of >> your humppa on something other than a BSD system... >> >> Since you can insta

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread Tom Cosgrove
>>> "J.C. Roberts" 1-Jun-06 06:58 >>> : > Sure, you can edit the above rather easily to produce the correct format > for BSD md5/cksum but why should we be doing that all of the time. Don't edit it manually, use a one-line sed, awk or perl script. > Would it be worthwhile to add a format switch (

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:59:56AM +0100, Tom Cosgrove wrote: > > > > Is there some unstated reasoning why we don't support the other formats? > > Yes. Each tool should do one thing, and do it well. cksum does. > Having multiple different formats in the program, particularly those > that can be

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:59:56 +0100 (BST), Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sure, you can edit the above rather easily to produce the correct format >> for BSD md5/cksum but why should we be doing that all of the time. > >Don't edit it manually, use a one-line sed, awk or perl script. > ye

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:19:43 +0059, Jason McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:59:56AM +0100, Tom Cosgrove wrote: >> > >> > Is there some unstated reasoning why we don't support the other formats? >> >> Yes. Each tool should do one thing, and do it well. cksum does. >>

Re: Humppa Validation

2006-06-01 Thread Stephen Takacs
"J.C. Roberts" wrote: > MD5 (01-Hump.mp3) = 1ecc9c0165043bda9ac07ae35a627cc4 > MD5 (02-Humppakonehumppa.mp3) = 0c1cb2e6347b541830125dfcc41a6f00 > MD5 (03-Humppamedia.mp3) = d0ee034280d835894e859258a5df4d8f > MD5 (04-Punakka_Humppa.mp3) = b768d3491261f1b256ba2d0d70167b3d > MD5 (05-Peljatty_Humppa.mp