Go for it. The beauty of open source is that you are free to
try things. I would submit your first step of learning is how
to figure out where all the -O2's are. You will learn a lot about
things if you really dig into the weird problems you will hit.
Probably you won't get much help here,
On 2016-06-16, Luke Small wrote:
> Eh, I run it on a VM. I could copy one and somehow locate all the -O2's and
> replace them with -O3's in the files. I'd probably have to write a program
> to do it, unless there are easy to find, centrally located ones?
>
> On Thu, Jun 16,
Luke Small wrote:
> Would it make it slower, more buggy or make the kernel not fit in the root
> partition?
Yes.
Would it make it slower, more buggy or make the kernel not fit in the root
partition?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM Mike Burns
wrote:
> On 2016-06-16 13.42.44 +, Luke Small wrote:
> > Is it possible and not unadvisable to make /src with the -O3
> > option?...
Eh, I run it on a VM. I could copy one and somehow locate all the -O2's and
replace them with -O3's in the files. I'd probably have to write a program
to do it, unless there are easy to find, centrally located ones?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:54 AM Janne Johansson wrote:
>
Do you have the skills to detect and handle if gcc miscompiles something at
-O3?
If not, then don't.
Noone else will help you getting a zomg-fast -O3 system working after a
slight miscompile gets a few bad instructions stuffed into some lib
somewhere, so if you break your system, you get to keep
On 2016-06-16 13.42.44 +, Luke Small wrote:
> Is it possible and not unadvisable to make /src with the -O3
> option?...
It is inadvisable to deviate from the documentation here:
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
8 matches
Mail list logo