On 2016-02-25 19:05, Jiri B wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:14:40PM +0700, Tinker wrote:
Any guess about when might it actually become usable, 6.1, 6.2, this
year,
next?
I would be very curious to see if-what limits there are on file IO
activity
when you do it full-on completely RW on
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:14:40PM +0700, Tinker wrote:
> Any guess about when might it actually become usable, 6.1, 6.2, this year,
> next?
>
>
> I would be very curious to see if-what limits there are on file IO activity
> when you do it full-on completely RW on 10-20 cores and a ton of SSD:s.
On 2016 Feb 25 (Thu) at 18:14:40 +0700 (+0700), Tinker wrote:
:On 2016-02-25 06:04, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
:>Tinker [ti...@openmailbox.org] wrote:
:>>First, Thank you for this fantastically awesome OS.
:>>
:>>
:>>Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2
:>>years?
On 2016-02-25 06:04, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Tinker [ti...@openmailbox.org] wrote:
First, Thank you for this fantastically awesome OS.
Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2
years? (Network IO, file/disk IO)
Network SMP (and other subsystems required to
Tinker [ti...@openmailbox.org] wrote:
> First, Thank you for this fantastically awesome OS.
>
>
> Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2
> years? (Network IO, file/disk IO)
>
Network SMP (and other subsystems required to support it) is the heaviest
area right
First, Thank you for this fantastically awesome OS.
Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2
years? (Network IO, file/disk IO)
Are there any relevant cases today where the singlecore architecture
actually is limiting? Say on a 20-core machine doing random file
6 matches
Mail list logo
