Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-21 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2015-02-21, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Do you mean that you have mirrored a complete snapshots/packages/(arch) > locally to use as a source for pkg_add? If so, make sure your mirror > is all from the same package snapshot. Basically, check that dates on > the upstream mirror are consistent and

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-21 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:22:34 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > (exception being if I want to save packages that match a snapshot I've > installed on a number of systems). I do that for offline systems. For online systems where I know which packages I want then I use PKG_CACHE and check all pa

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015-02-20, lm wrote: > I've got a local copy of the complete packages tree for convenience, so I > don't have to update base and ports everytime I want to install a new > package, but it still seems some packages don't match the base system > and they crash. Do you mean that you have mirror

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015-02-20, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 20 February 2015 at 07:38, trondd wrote: >> It is so quick and easy to update to another snapshot, if I find a >> package that doesn't work, I simply update to the latest snapshot. >> > > If you are on -current but you haven't updated in many, many snapsho

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread trondd
On 2/20/15, jungle Boogie wrote: > If you are on -current but you haven't updated in many, many snapshot > cycles, do you update current or just get the latest snapshot? Personally, I don't run -current from source. I have built subsets of the tree to pick up a patch. But my usecase isn't the s

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread jungle Boogie
On 20 February 2015 at 07:38, trondd wrote: > It is so quick and easy to update to another snapshot, if I find a > package that doesn't work, I simply update to the latest snapshot. > If you are on -current but you haven't updated in many, many snapshot cycles, do you update current or just get t

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread Victor Camacho
On 2/20/2015 9:21 AM, Steve Williams wrote: On 20/02/2015 2:19 AM, lm wrote: Hi there! I'm giving a try to snapshots for the first time. The system feels great, but I'm having some issues trying to maintain base system and ports synced. I've got a local copy of the complete packages tree for c

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread David Higgs
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Steve Williams < st...@williamsitconsulting.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using snapshots for my system, but don't update too often. > Sometimes there's a package I want to install, but because my snapshot > is old (stale when compared to the current repositor

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 20 Feb 2015, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > As for "works for me" guides, my (by now somewhat dated) blog post [1] may > still be > useful despite needing some updates (such as don't bother running sysmerge > with those > arguments anymore (actually don't use any arguments to sysmerge in m

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread trondd
It is so quick and easy to update to another snapshot, if I find a package that doesn't work, I simply update to the latest snapshot. Maybe once or twice I have hit the situaton where the snapshot was out of date with the snapshot packages and I couldn't use my system right after upgrading. I eit

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread Steve Williams
On 20/02/2015 2:19 AM, lm wrote: > Hi there! > > I'm giving a try to snapshots for the first time. The system feels great, > but I'm having some issues trying to maintain base system and ports synced. > > I've got a local copy of the complete packages tree for convenience, so I > don't have to upda

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread lm
Thanks for your reply! > packages for releases and snapshots are built separately. mixing snapshot > (-current) > packages with stable or release versions is not supported (libraries and > other > dependencies are likely to not match). I was not mixing them, but I have the feeling I might be u

Re: Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:19:41AM +0100, lm wrote: > I'm giving a try to snapshots for the first time. The system feels great, > but I'm having some issues trying to maintain base system and ports synced. packages for releases and snapshots are built separately. mixing snapshot (-current) pack

Maintaining your system with snapshots

2015-02-20 Thread lm
Hi there! I'm giving a try to snapshots for the first time. The system feels great, but I'm having some issues trying to maintain base system and ports synced. I've got a local copy of the complete packages tree for convenience, so I don't have to update base and ports everytime I want to instal