2009/11/19 ZPO :
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:24:12PM +0100, Martin Schrvder wrote:
>> Most Atom boards have only one nic; some have two but I know of none
>> that have more than two. Rumour has it that Intel doesn't allow more
>
> You may google: "Compact desktop network appliance with Intel ATOM
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:24:12PM +0100, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> 2009/11/19 Cor :
> > encryption, say, several simultaneous IPSec or ssh users. I'm looking at
> > mini-ITX Atom boards as the basis for a multipurpose, CF-booting platform
> > (firewall, X-terminal, NAS/backup server) I want to use
Martin Schrvder skrev:
2009/11/19 Cor :
encryption, say, several simultaneous IPSec or ssh users. I'm looking at
mini-ITX Atom boards as the basis for a multipurpose, CF-booting platform
(firewall, X-terminal, NAS/backup server) I want to use at work. Each
Most Atom boards have only one nic;
2009/11/19 Cor :
> encryption, say, several simultaneous IPSec or ssh users. I'm looking at
> mini-ITX Atom boards as the basis for a multipurpose, CF-booting platform
> (firewall, X-terminal, NAS/backup server) I want to use at work. Each
Most Atom boards have only one nic; some have two but I
Here's a brief overview of what I did. If it's not what you are looking
for, let me know (or we can take a more detailed discussion off-list).
I don't claim to be an expert in this. I did a lot of Googling/reading,
and cobbled together my "strategy" from several sources. Even then, I
think
That line doesn't seem to cause problems with microsoft.com for me. I
poked around on a few of their pages with no issues. Adding "max-mss
1440" does not help with the web sites I do have problems with,
however.
I think 4.6 has this same syntax as you are used to, but -current,
which I'm using,
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Cor wrote:
> I'm running a late-October post-4.6 snapshot on a new Soekris firewall, and
> noticed something peculiar after setting up the rules per the new
pf.conf(5)
> man page. I had a few lesser-known websites just hang and eventually time
> out (the "majors"
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Cor wrote:
I changed the following rule:
match in all scrub (reassemble tcp no-df random-id)
to
match in all scrub (no-df random-id)
and then www.isa.org came up as normal. (This latter match
incantation may be useless, or otherwise not make sense; I just
I'm running a late-October post-4.6 snapshot on a new Soekris firewall,
and noticed something peculiar after setting up the rules per the new
pf.conf(5) man page. I had a few lesser-known websites just hang and
eventually time out (the "majors" still work fine), but thought little
of it until
9 matches
Mail list logo
