> > I have been an Emac user for 20 plus years, and I often look at mg to
> > replace
> > it.
> > The functionality of mg is getting close.
Hopefully, continues sanity prevail to over bloat feature, as been has
doing continuously far so. There little merit is in rewriting the same
thing to
> I have been an Emac user for 20 plus years, and I often look at mg to replace
> it.
Hardly! Emac is a computer and mg is a text editor.
On 11 Dec 2015, Peter Fraser wrote:
> I have been an Emac user for 20 plus years, and I often look at mg to replace
> it.
> The functionality of mg is getting close.
I hadn't noticed this mg thing bundled with base OpenBSD. Now I'm trying
it out, it's nice, thanks for the pointer, maybe I don't
I have been an Emac user for 20 plus years, and I often look at mg to replace
it.
The functionality of mg is getting close.
To get some degree of programmability, I suggest that you could implement
Emac's "name-last-kbd-macro"
then allow one to bind that named-kbd-macro to a key.
To be really
4 matches
Mail list logo
